GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yue Hwa Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 15:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


1b. The needs to be expanded to appropriately summarize the entire article. See this page.
2b. Note, I have made a few changes to the in-line citations.
6a. I added an image.
7. If not for the insufficient lead, this article would pass. Until such time as the lead adequately summarizes the article, I can't pass the article.

@QatarStarsLeague: I have rewritten the lead section. How is the new lead section? It may need some copyediting. --Hildanknight (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is suitable; the article passes! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yue_Hwa_Building
No tags for this post.