This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Religious texts (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts Judaism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Near East High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Literature High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Literature / Ethics / Religion / Ancient High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Ethics Philosophy of religion Ancient philosophy

needs crosslinking to German Weisheitsliteratur: i have no idea how that is done

You put [[de:Weisheitsliteratur]] at the end --Henrygb 16:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merged Sapiential Books to here. - 74.138.110.32 (talk) 03:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is exactly Israel here? Israelites? Hebrew literature?

There is a large field of discussion about 'wisdom literature' in Anglo-Saxon corpus that is appropriate to include here

See for reference:

-Gnomic Poetry In anglosaxon Issue 49 , Blanche Colton Williams -The Solomon Complex , Elaine Tuttle Hansen - Job, ecclesiastes, and the mechanics of wisdom in Old English Poetry - Lyric gnome in old English poetry

Note, the Americans seem to dislike Anglo-Saxon due to their perceived personal history with the term. In England however the term is acceptable. I think old English is more common for describing the literature though, its a matter of taste I guess. Its pretty much synonymous in usage.

CantingCrew (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)CantingCrew[reply]

There’s many specific Mesopotamian examples of wisdom literature — shouldn’t they be added to this article? Bagabondo (talk) 14:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wisdom Literature article in the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica seems to have a broader scope, and is certainly more detailed, than the text here or at Poetic Books. I don't know how much of that detail reflects current understanding of the term as used today, or if there would be value in spinning off a different Wikipedia article, or if it is too Anglican-establishment oriented for current use. Perhaps we could simply notate its appearance in the Bibliography as containing more insight. Does anyone with more specialized knowledge have any insights? David Brooks (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]