GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 20:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 01:31, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:31, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

  • track and field and basketball at the school you can just delete "at the school" as this is implied
    • Done.
  • He won more letters in football I have never thought of letters as something you "win", is there a better way to phrase this?
    • I have seen that wording used a decent amount (e.g. [1]), but I changed it to "received" a letter.
  • The last paragraph of the "Early life" section, every sentence starts with "He..." Could you find a way to rephrase one or two sentences to break that up a bit?
    • Merged a sentence.
  • two years,[19] and began comma isn't needed and you can push the ref to the end of the sentence, if you desire
    • Done.
  • References: all are consistently formatted and appropriate for what is being cited
    • Ref #2 and #16 need access-dates
      • Done.
    • Spot checks: #2, 6, 7, 10, 13, 17, 20, and 25 all check out

That's all I got, nice work BeanieFan11! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No tags for this post.