![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for a very useful article, and for the time and hard work that you have contributed here. I have checked the article for Standard English, neutrality, copyright violation, and some minor issues, but no problem was found. Note that in the context of this article, "less" refers to a more minor degree, and "fewer" refers to a smaller number.
Storye book (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- The taxon has not been published yet. The cited reference is a pre-proof article that it is still under review process. Lmalena (talk) 16:40, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to copy over what I said to you on my talk page—it is standard practice to create pages for new taxa within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, even when the publication is in the "in-press" stage (not to be confused with preprint). The paper is peer-reviewed and has been accepted for publication. It will not undergo any changes in its finalization that will affect the scientific content. -SlvrHwk (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for this information, SlvrHwk. Storye book (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to copy over what I said to you on my talk page—it is standard practice to create pages for new taxa within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, even when the publication is in the "in-press" stage (not to be confused with preprint). The paper is peer-reviewed and has been accepted for publication. It will not undergo any changes in its finalization that will affect the scientific content. -SlvrHwk (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.