This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. Human rights Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Jammu and Kashmir / Cinema / History / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in March 2022. Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This is a biased article and doesn’t not even have the name of scholars who find it fictional. Shame. Shinychaudhary (talk) 09:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article has lots of reliable sources for finding the film fictional. Have you looked at the footnotes? Bishonen | tålk 09:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC).[reply]

how a journalist feels about a film shouldn't be included. Some people feel positive some negative. Personal feelings should be kept out it Akt 2000 (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is incorrect because u have burder of evidence and fail to provide any, u see the people who find it fictional simply said so,for example

1) Shashi Tharoor and MP of India

2) Ravish Kumar a fierce and famous yet often biased media anchor

as for Evidence that this film is correct

The GOVERNMENT OF INDIA literally used it in the UNITED NATIONS against government of Pakistan

The entire world including Pakistani Government and the Opposition Party of India had the opportunity to counter India's Argument, one simply can not ignore those arguments

I respect wiki pedia but you all must realise that their is no universe that we can ignore the Official testimony of The worlds biggest democracy in the literal UN

No other nations countered our argument

These were then portrayed in the movie

If u r a wiki mod,I need uo Dareutodefeatmeinadebateratherthencensoringme (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely right. And why can't we edit the page for correctness? Hie can a historical fact, based on numerous eye witnesses and records be termed as fictional? 2409:4080:D86:E154:937:2522:C86D:F399 (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should add information about the docu-series The Kashmir Files: Unreported, which is being seen as a sequel to the movie. the series contains interviews that were conducted as a part of the research for the film.

Some link: https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/kashmir-files-unreported-post-iffi-row-vivek-agnihotri-announces-kashmir-files-follow-up-film/article66204169.ece

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/vivek-agnihotri-unveils-series-the-kashmir-files-unreported-makes-big-claim-4228831

https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/exclusive-watch-pallavi-joshi-on-the-kashmir-files-unreported-nobody-calls-me-to-work-in-their-films-12910672.html

https://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/web-series/article/the-kashmir-files-unreported-vivek-ranjan-agnihotria-pallavi-joshi-promote-upcoming-series-at-dal-lake-23299878

Why is the page locked ? 103.95.173.75 (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Because people kept trying to claim that it was a documentary, or a true story. Black Kite (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Indian government literally used it in United Nations publically...if u think you know more then the Pakistani government, Indian government, every other nations in UN ...then go ahead provide evidence,I will now down and admit my mistake

  Context - the stories portrayed in the movie where earlier said in UN in text form Dareutodefeatmeinadebateratherthencensoringme (talk) 16:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pls put up correct facts on Wikipedia. Thought the movie was a bit extreme. But it have shown truth. If not, how come the Kashmir which was once have a huge population of Kashmiri pandit , are now left in rarity. And to Wikipedia . I am a donor and pls don’t put wrong facts for your secularism and tell that the persecution of Kashmiri pandit was not done . Be factual as people trust woke Pedia and it’s not a movie made for entertainment 103.171.132.46 (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  BelowTheSun  (T•C) 19:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may or may not be interested in the WP-article Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]