The Incredible Hulk (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	The Incredible Hulk (film) is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase One films series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 3, 2008 Good article nominee Listed April 5, 2015 Good topic candidate Promoted November 18, 2019 Good topic removal candidate Demoted April 21, 2024 Good topic candidate Promoted Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance). Film: Comic book / Marvel Cinematic Universe / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Comic book films task force. This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Comics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group. This article is supported by Comic book films work group. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think the Future section should at least mention that the character of "Thunderbolt" Ross did return in further MCU films, such as Captain America: Civil War and Avengers: Infinity War. --2001:4C4E:224D:3400:470:FF80:80E0:13AE (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If editors would favour a special carveout from RFC findings of WP:GUNREL on a source - e.g. to allow special carveouts for usage of a a source found WP:GUNREL in a broad general RFC - the correct venue for such would be WP:RSN, where the RFC ran - David Gerard (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Placing a citation needed tag. If no change in a few weeks, I will replace with correct information and citations. Sterlingjones (talk) 18:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have updated information supported with reliable sources then feel free to add that to the body of the article. The summary in the lead can then be updated if required. - adamstom97 (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the lead sentence can be reexamined. It does seem like it's a very "cause and effect" statement that solely because of the editing disagreement, he wasn't brought back. While that probably was one factor, I don't think it was the only factor. I think Johanna Robinson's book may covered some of this, though I don't know if any websites published those excerpts. Regardless, I think some more sourcing on the replacement could be added down in "Future" to then support a refined lead sentence. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done my pass of adds from Reign of Marvel Studios and in that edit added in quoted material from Feige's statement on replacing Norton. With that, I've updated the material in the lead about it that I think better reflects all that happened and was known. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the lead section have to be so verbose about this though?[1] Clarify as verbosely as you want in the article body but the WP:LEAD is supposed to summarize, and going on about it at length in the lead section seems unnecessary. The lead section need only state that he was replaced or more neutrally did not return, specific examples simply don't belong in the lead section, that's not what it is for. -- 109.77.195.4 (talk) 16:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be fine for a cut-down version in the lead, just stating this should be okay: Norton was replaced in the role of Banner by Mark Ruffalo for future MCU content starting with The Avengers in 2012. - adamstom97 (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]