This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ska vi älska, så ska vi älska till Buddy Holly/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: VirreFriberg (talk · contribs) 00:39, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 11:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will start this today and run into tomorrow! --K. Peake 11:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove the venue parameter from the infobox
• "of his friends. The lyrics were set to an" → "of his friends, setting it to an" to avoid overly short sentences
• Remove overly obvious wikilink on Stockholm as a capital
• "and the band did not" → "and Gyllene Tider did not"
• Shouldn't you mention what was praised about the song as well as it having been noted as weaker?
• "in band set list." → "in tour set lists." to more specific.

• Img looks good!
• "and was additionally part of" → "This was additionally part of" to start a new sentence for avoiding a run-on
• Wikilink A major to itself
• "who has listening to" → "who has listened to"
• "as one of Gyllene Tider's biggest inspirations" this needs to be re-worded to either specify Elvis Costello was one of the biggest inspirations himself or "two of" if you are referring to both
• Remove overly obvious wikilink on Stockholm as a capital

• [15][14] should be placed in numerical order
• "and the album's closing track" → "and the closing track" to avoid repetition of album
• "in the top-ten." → "in the top-10." per MOS:NUM on comparative values
• "who's host had disqualified" → "whose host had disqualified"
• "it spent on" → "the song spent on"
• "to being release" → "to being released"
• [29] should only be invoked at the end of the sentence; I understand [28] being used before the first comma but [29] backs up all the albums following the second clause
• Wikilink live album
• [30] should only be invoked at the end of the sentence because this is used for all of the live albums

• "received primarily positive reviews" → "was met with primarily positive reviews"
• "of the band's debut album in" → "of Gyllene Tider's debut album in"
• "with the critic who noted the" → "with a critic noting the"
• "Upon the single release, Göteborgs-Tidningen called it a" → "A reviewer for Göteborgs-Tidningen called the song a" because the upon part only needs to be used once
• Img looks good!
• "stated that "any song with 'making love' referenced twice in the titled written" → "stated that a song referencing love twice in the title "written" to avoid overquoting
• Boring is too obvious to be in quote marks
• "and were included on" → "The song was included on" starting a new sentence to avoid a run-on
• The last sentence should only use since either at the end or earlier on

• Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
• The songwriters and producers should be listed here since they need to be sourced

• Good

• Good

• For any of the notes where the refs cited for them are the same as the ones at that point in the prose, please remove the refs from here
• Copyvio score looks really good at 29.6%!!
• Cite Time as magazine on ref 2

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed, came through by the end of the evening here in the UK! --K. Peake 20:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi! We meet once more, @Kyle Peake! I've revided the article after your suggestions.

  The source for songwriters, engineers, mixers and producers is listen in the Gyllene Tider re-issue sleeve notes on ^[1]; "produced by Lasse "Trendy Hype" Lindbom, engineer Björn Boström. Mixed by Trendy, Björne, Per and Mats. Lyrics by: Per Gessle. Music by: Mats Persson and Per Gessle, except "Skicka ett vykort, älskling" ("Send Me a Postcard"), lyrics by Per Gessle, music by Robbie van Leeuwen and "Billy", lyrics and music by Per Gessle."

  VirreFriberg (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2025 (UTC) VirreFriberg (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]