This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Central Asia Siege of Khujand is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Russian & Soviet This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work

North8000 (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I note that Morrison uses the casualty figures provided by Romanovsky, ie 71 killed or wounded, 65 suffered "contusions", and 6 missing, but the article only relates Mamadaliev's figures (which seem extremely low given the number of Khujandis killed). To achieve NPOV I think that the article should at least reflect what Morrison says, and contrast that with Mamadaliev's figures. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:24, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Not including Morrison's figures was entirely an oversight on my part. Given the relative weight of each parties claims, I believe that Romanovsky's estimate should be placed in the infobox and body, while Mamadaliev's estimate should be placed in a note. If we want to directly contrast them in the infobox without a note, what would be a good way of concisely conveying that information, given the overlapping counts between each? CitrusHemlock 00:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]