Rama was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 28, 2006 Peer review Reviewed April 10, 2006 Good article nominee Listed July 2, 2009 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hinduism: Krishnaism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Top-importance). Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Nepal Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology High‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the cited source no. 56 Hindery 1978, pp. 98–99, Kusha and Lava are not mentioned, while they are mentioned in the sentence citing it.

The sentence should be corrected to be in sync with the cited source. Riteze (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

adding extra 'A' due to absence of required vowels in english. Proper Noun should not be changed. Never heard in any ancient text referring RAMA as main name. Godeditor0 (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Godeditor0 Rama is a Sanskrit name, and names in Sanskrit often end with a vowel - in this case, an a(अ). Sanskrit nominals#Building blocks might help to understand a bit more. Asteramellus (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a huge inconsistency and incoherence between, the end date of Treta Yuga (867,102 BCE) with what is mentioned in the first sentence (5000 BCE). Tamir Nazir (talk) 07:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]