GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Theta224 (talk · contribs) 01:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OceanHok (talk · contribs) 04:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I have decided to quickfail the article due to several concerns:

  • The gameplay section is very underdeveloped. For instance, the gloo cannon, a prominent weapon in the game, is not mentioned. As a mechanically complicated game, the gameplay section for the main game is too short and skips over a lot of details.
  • The reception section relies almost exclusively on listicles, which is not ideal. We need to cover the content of actual reviews. There should also be more content about retrospective commentary on the game as well.

In my opinion, it doesn't meet WP:GACR6#3, meaning that it has failed to address the main aspects of the topic. Since there is still a lot more work to be done, I have decided to fail this nomination instead of putting it on hold. OceanHok (talk) 04:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No tags for this post.