This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Reproductive Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as High-importance). Women's Health High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

I've added a paragraph on another type of test mentioned in the news. Does anyone know for certain whether it is the "Baby Gender Mentor" which is being referred to? Gabbe (talk) 15:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The section needs flushing out with regard to the timeline of when various technologies were developed to determine the sex of the pre-born child. 69.181.112.16 (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to write this up right now, but here is some info about South Korea.

^[1]

In short: it was illegal from 1987 until 2008 (when it was declared unconstitutional)

203.221.30.214 (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]