Former good article nomineeMrBeast was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 23, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
March 29, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee


Political Views

https://x.com/MrBeast/status/1878132133144715658

Reference to his opposition to the American healthcare system should be mentioned. He "broke character" in one of his videos (prosthetic legs), to say how much he does disagrees with it. Tweet above also echoes the sentiment. Habat1165 (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Habat1165 Interesting. We should include it, its a major political issue, particularly for progressives Jayson (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not to put a wet blanket on this, but be sure to add WP:RS/P to cite the mention. X is primary and irrelevant if not covered by multiple, reliable sources. My quick evaluation of the sources suggests there could be a case for inclusion here, but be wary of syndicated articles, generally considered unreliable, like this one on Yahoo! News [1]. Our opinion on whether or not something is notable doesn't matter (just ask WP:BFDI). Pistongrinder (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2025

Mrbeast has had many products, such as the cookies, burgers, bars and not feastables. Companies copied Mrbeast burger so he shut it down for good. Cucumberbanana (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Annh07 (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possible good article

Hey @Endof@Real4jyy@Nice Stories you are the top editors to this article and I think it is really GA content, are any of you up to nominating it and following through with it? Thanks Yeshivish613 (talk) 12:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No answer...
I'm very familiar with this article and its citations, so it looks like I can nominate it myself... Yeshivish613 (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok @Boneless Pizza! I'm not insulted you reverted my nomination, I mean after all I only did one edit and hadn't written any comment on the talk page... Yeshivish613 (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you object let me know here. Cheers Yeshivish613 (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeshivish613, to my eye the article does not currently meet the GA criteria: there are a lot of one-sentence paragraphs, for example. Further, as someone who is not a significant contributor to the article, you need to get agreement from those who are prior to nominating per the GA nomination instructions, and waiting for two days is not sufficient; the absolute minimum is seven days, and even then, there is no rush. I am reverting your nomination as out of process. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
trout Self-trout I see. Sorry about that. Yeshivish613 (talk) 23:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2025

pls let me edit i am a publisher Nivaan Alva (talk) 09:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Annh07 (talk) 11:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.