This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I've done a rough de-spamming; I'm sure some of the content's useful, but it should be rewritten from scratch so it doesn't sound like a press release. Acroterion (talk) 00:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, there is little to salvage here. I'm taking a stab at the worst of it. Kendall-K1 (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the first to notice this, so I'm just chiming in and tagging it. The article is actually quite informative, it just needs toning down - and referencing. There is also too little from independent third party sources.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]