This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Film: Marvel Cinematic Universe This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force.

The List of Armors currently in the article is pretty much the definition of what WP:GAMECRUFT says to keep out of articles. It fails point #6 - Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts: Specific point values, achievements and trophies, time-limits, levels, character moves, character weight classes, vehicles, and so on are considered inappropriate.

• Remove from article - per rationale above. Sergecross73 msg me 02:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove - this information isn't at all necessary in order to understand the game. It could be replaced with a simple statement about N number of armor upgrades being available and still have the same impact. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 02:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Done. It's cruft. Kill on sight. Woodroar (talk) 02:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. I know this was rather blatant and obvious, but the other user was being rather belligerent with me, so I wanted to demonstrate that the community wouldn't support it either. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 03:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]