This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. Animation: American / Looney Tunes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Low-importance).

No, it's not "rubbish". When an editor is editing information, it best that then template is readable as possible and not a jumbled up mess. There are no rules or guidelines that for forbid or discourage the practice of spacing the templates. Plus there the fact that source pages for these do present them in spaced form supports my argument. Clearly your edit is disruptive. Sarujo (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]