sources

can anyone find any websites with most of this information on it? I'm doing a report for school but wikipedia isn't allowed... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.218.215 (talk) 02:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other discussion

There was a move request at Talk:Fritz Straßmann, following a cut-and-paste duplication, that's relevant to this article. Any future move discussions should take place here.Cúchullain t/c 16:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fritz Strassmann/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 20:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 10:24, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • This is a well-written history and I therefore have little to remark on in this review.
  • Why is the subject named as "Strassmann" with double s in most of the article, while 'Internal report' and 'Further reading' follow German Wikipedia in naming him "Straßmann" with scharfes s? Perhaps it would be best to give both spellings at the top of the article, and then to use just one spelling throughout.
    checkY I have standardised on "Strassmann", but Commons uses ""Straßmann". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've done a small amount of copy-editing.

Images

  • The lead image is fair use with a valid NFUR.
  • The other images are on Commons and plausibly licensed.

Sources

  • The citations are mainly in last, first style (Doe, John C.) but there are some in first last style (John C. Doe). It would be best to use last, first throughout, most easily by using the cite journal / cite book template consistently.
    checkY Used the cite templates for consistency. I note here that consistent citations is not required at GA, but only at the FA level. (Wikipedia:Content assessment) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Titles of journal articles should be in roman not italics; again, this would best be handled by using the cite journal template which applies the formatting automatically.
    checkY Changed as suggested. Note that at GA level,articles only have to comply with Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style or its subpages is not required for good articles. (Wikipedia:Good article criteria) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Papers (and books) in German should have the parameter |language=de, which creates "(in German)" in the citation. Where a translation is not already present, an English translation should be provided using the parameter |trans-title=.
  • 'Further reading' should per MoS be after the list of references, here called "Notes". The authors should be in last, first format. The works should be marked as in German (as in the 'Papers' item above).
    checkY Moved. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Spot-checks: [4], [12], [20] ok.

Summary

  • The technical content here is excellent and fully-cited, but the article needs a little tidying-up as noted above.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 07:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Hawkeye7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 439 past nominations.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:53, 2 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • That hook feels... off, somehow. It needs more. How about ALT1: "that Fritz Strassmann hid a Jewish woman from the Nazis, refused to join the Nazi party, and co-discovered nuclear fission" ? DS (talk) 03:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Strassmann's two major claims to fame is having co-discovered nuclear fission with Otto Hahn (who got the Nobel Prize because he was in charge) and being one of the righteous among nations (the Jewish woman he concealed was not well known to him, but he took her in knowing that she was wanted by the Gestapo and he ran the risk of all of them being turned in by his Nazi neighbours.) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:58, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article, promoted to GA on 2 Feb, is new enough, long enough, well-written and well-sourced. No apparent copyvio. QPQ done. I prefer Hawkeye7's ALT0, which is cited and in the article. Thank you for this interesting article on one of the Righteous Among the Nations. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fritz_Strassmann
No tags for this post.