This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Poland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I propose merging Expressway S2 Tunnel into Expressway S2 (Poland). I think the content in Expressway S2 Tunnel can easily be explained in the context of Expressway S2 (Poland), and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Expressway S2 (Poland). Soybean46 (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge – this can be adequatly explained as a tunnels section of the Expressway S2 (Poland) Soybean46 (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  +1 for "Merge" from me, good idea. Regarding SIGCOV, if something meets SIGCOV then it can a separate article, but it doesn't mean it needs to be a separate article - otherwise, basiacally any single section of a highway could need to be a separate article, because each section can be argued to meet SIGCOV due to its press coverage at the time of the construction and the opening of the section. Kirt93 (talk) Kirt93 (talk) 21:28, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't merge – perhaps this article qualifies as an article of its own because it more or less meets SIGCOV Soybean46 (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]