This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

I would like to see the article expanded to discuss the concent of a "gay syangogue." It does not make sense for people to congregate according to their sexual preferences. Should we have articles on tuna fish synagogues for congregations of people who like tuna fish?--Dontlikeitinthetuchis (talk) 14:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

we're not here to discuss the concept. We are only here to write about what can be proven about this specific congregation. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If there were a synagogue for people who like tuna fish, I'm certain Wikipedia would have an article on it. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ever feed the trolls, Jayjg.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:37, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually quite interested in writing that article now, must do some research. Wish me luck! Jayjg ^(talk) 02:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]