The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPath^talk 13:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ciqikou station (Chongqing Rail Transit) → Ciqikou station – Disambiguation no longer needed. The Beijing subway station now uses the name "Ciqi Kou station". Courtesy ping to Johnj1995 who submitted this at RMTR after having a previous G6 (db-move) request on this reverted by Pppery on grounds of a potential PCM, so here it is! Intrisit (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinyin romanizations are known to be inconsistent in their use (or not) of spaces, so I don't see this as sufficient WP:SMALLDETAILS here. 162 etc. (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC) — Copied from WP:RMTR Intrisit (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  My reason for contesting was along the lines of 162 etc.'s. I don't have anything more to say here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Obviously not, as the ping was for clarity and posterity. After all, I would've enacted the "db-move" myself if I hadn't seen from the page history of the proposed title that the request nominator at RMTR (whom I've pinged) already did same before you reverted on grounds of a potential PCM, hence why I've enacted an RM here. Also 162 etc.'s comment above came just as (again) I was contemplating the "db-move" request myself. In short, I wasn't expecting any reaction from you anyway. Intrisit (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Pppery and 162 etc. – robertsky (talk) 23:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]