Talk:Christine Hakim

Former good articleChristine Hakim was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed
May 1, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 10, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Teguh Karya had to fight for Christine Hakim's right to act in Cinta Pertama (First Love) after his producer said her breasts were too small?
Current status: Delisted good article

Photograph

Need to replace her picture with a larger preferably free use/public domain photo and upload it to wikimedia:commons

Mkouklis (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Christine Hakim/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 22:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.[reply]

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    One of these films was Eros Djarot's 1988 film Tjoet Nja' Dhien, in which Hakim was cast as Cut Nyak Dhien, an Acehnese guerilla leader, which won the 1989 Cannes Film Festival award for Best International Film, being screened in Le Semaine de Critique. would be better split into smaller sentences as the subject becomes confused.
    Hakim later described the role as a "huge honour" and "very challenging"; she also credits the role for answering her questions on her identity. confusion of tense.
    In producing the film, she chose young director Garin Nugroho for his talent and took the leading role. ungrammatical.
    Aside from acting, Hakim is also a documentary filmmaker. . ungrammatical
    She has also begun producing a documentary on the Dayak people of Kalimantan When, be specific.
    The prose could do with a copy-edit throughout to improve the flow.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Sources appear WP:RS.
    The bibliography should be reserved for books, The news sources would be better served by using the {{cite news}} template.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    reasonable coverage
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Two images used, but the Julia Roberts image at an awards ceremony does not add any thing to the article.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I think it passes muser now, happy to list as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 02:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality

Since it has been awhile since the last assessment, I have had another look at the current version and noticed the following:

  • The "Awards" and "Filmography" sections have "unsourced" banners from 2022.
  • The "Biography" section has numerous paragraphs, and should probably be broken up with level 3 headings.
  • The lead does not have more recent information and events in it.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The "Awards" and "Filmography" sections have "unsourced" banners from 2022. The "Biography" section has numerous paragraphs, and should probably be broken up with level 3 headings. The lead does not have post-2011 information and events in it. Z1720 (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.