This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Occult Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

@Skyerise: These reasons to quickfail are at the same time obvious and pretty superficial, and had already been identified on the talk page. I only regret that I hadn't done more myself sooner. I'm confident that this can become a good article in due course. —Alalch E. 20:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed the uncited sources and further reading issues... Skyerise (talk) 20:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The techniques articles themselves need to be improved, so that they may be better summarized here. —Alalch E. 20:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]