This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: African / South Pacific / British / Canadian / European / French / North America / Russian & Soviet / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  African military history task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force British military history task force Canadian military history task force European military history task force French military history task force North American military history task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Soviet Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Big Three at Tehran Conference: Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill

• ... that there were five individuals leaders of the Big Three in World War II? Source: see sources in 'Composition of the Big Three'
  • ALT1: ... that Stalin is considered the most successful leader of the Big Three in World War II? Source: Dukes and Kingseed as cited in the relevant sentence
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Demons of the Punjab

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Comment: Can I propose ALT2: ... that the Big Three had five members? ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 04:38, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sure! In that short form we could keep it for April Fools even :P --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Review: Should've indicated that this was expanded instead of created, article passes all DYK checks, contents cited, all clear. Approved ALT2. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 01:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not sure if 'expanded' counts for redirects? Not that's it's a biggie, but if closing admin has a comment here, do ping us :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You want "Converted from a redirect" instead of "Created", such at The World's Biggest Gang Bang III – The Houston 620. I've updated this.--Launchballer 12:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]