This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Spain Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This chapter is too self-contradictin (2200 vs. 1800 for the start-off) as to be convincing at all. Perhaps the reason are too old dates achieved in some tests of the KIA labaratory (see Radiocarbon journal).HJJHolm (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Argar

This article seems to be covering the same subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.45.107.10 (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've put a merger proposal for the two items as they are in the same region, have the same dates, have similar names and don't have anything that differentiates them. They both seem to have numerous duplicate language links which is why I'd like further discussion. Is there a reason for that?

JASpencer (talk) 07:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the Spanish article for es:El Argar it appears to be about the site, so I'll reorient the El Argar article rather than merge it.

JASpencer (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]