This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

The article indicates that Beckham had sex with a 14 year old boy. It then states that because the boy consented, no rape charges could be made. I've read the pre-2008 law, and though it indicated that consent for sex can be given by 14 year olds, it also stated that one could not consent to anal sex until they were 18. Anyone know why that subsection of the law in question wasn't explored? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.27.142.106 (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please specify if the conditions described in the sentence I removed were present before or after the criminal act, or both. I do not think the prev version was clear about this chronology. thank you. S*K*A*K*K 16:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I count 6 criticisms of the legislation, and no endorsements. Surely there were, in a country of 31 million people, groups and organizations that supported the legislation? Why is there not a section on endorsements or support of the legislation? The neutrality of this article is in sharp disrepute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.15.68 (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]