This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Horror Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The grammar and spelling in the plot section is the worst I've ever seen. I'm going to bed, but that writing might give me a nightmare. I didn't look at teh rest of the entry, but oh wow! the plot section is bad.

Not sure this section is notable enough. The connection between the creepy clown sightings and this movie is tenuous at best.SwampZombieCult (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not. I've been following the clown sightings, the 31 connection was discussed maybe a handful of times before being debunked. There certainly was very little 'controversy' surrounding the film over it.--CyberGhostface (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]