![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://itn.co.uk/news/3967b7a45c8a1847f5ba6d060069a0ec.html
- In 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot on 2011-05-26 02:25:19, 404 Not Found
- In 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot on 2011-06-14 22:27:34, 404 Not Found
- In 21 July 2005 London bombings on 2011-06-19 05:25:16, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 21 July 2005 London bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13397188,00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1702712,00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1189833,00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1189920,00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.theguardian.com/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1538935,00.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121135832/http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2162851.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2162851.ece
- Added archive https://archive.is/20070611154745/http://www.pmo.gov.uk/output/Page7969.asp to http://www.pmo.gov.uk/output/Page7969.asp
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://cms.met.police.uk/news/major_operational_announcements/terrorist_attacks/london_incidents_21_july
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 21 July 2005 London bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5v7oxzBQu?url=http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13397188,00.html to http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13397188,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
"Islamic terrorism"
Whoever keeps adding the words "islamic terrorism" and related templates to the article, should better find reliable sources for this. As it stands now, the perpetrators were found guilty of an "intention to murder" and not of terrorism. The article, based on sources, also makes it clear that the motive behind the attack was "revenge" and not religion (i.e., a sense of a religious obligation). Will be removing these POV templates added fairly recently. — kashmīrī TALK 08:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 20 March 2025
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to 21 July 2005 London attempted bombings. for consistency with other articles. (non-admin closure) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
21 July 2005 London bombings → 21 July 2005 London attempted bombings – or 21 July 2005 attempted London bombings. If I understand correctly, this was a failed bombing attempt. None of the devices exploded as intended, resulting only in popping sounds and one person having an asthma attack – and the police hunting down and killing an innocent person the next day. There wasn't even any significant property damage. The 7 July 2005 London bombings article uses a pipe for its link to this article, identifying it as "a series of attempted attacks". That phrase seems more accurate than the current article title. — BarrelProof (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support I agree it should be moved to something on those lines.
- Rafts of Calm (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Rafts of Calm. Shankargb (talk) 17:37, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.