This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Numbers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

As the first integer without a wikipedia page is this number notable enough to deserve a page? There is an argument hare about how not having a wiki page makes 215 interesting enough to deserve one http://liveatthewitchtrials.blogspot.com/2009/11/215-wiki-interesting-number.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.201.196 (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go read interesting number paradox. DS (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Being a composite number is not interesting. Being visually symmetrical is not interesting. Article needs 3 interesting properties to exist. lethargilistic (talk) 10:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]