This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thanks for the rescue job. I've been following this story for some years (the video EL's are mine). As one of a handful of City TLDs likely to be delegated under ICANN's new rollout I don't see how it can fail to be notable. That said, the City's trumpeting of "approval" while reliably reported is a jumping of the gun somewhat. The .nyc tld has passed initial valuation - it is yet to be approved. It is assumed by the City and Neustar that the rest is a formality, but there are a few hoops yet. For instance, in a recent appearance in NYC the NTIA's Larry Strickling, in response to a question (17:10), spoke of not renewing .us with Neustar due to a lack of multistakeholderism in its management. Similar objections could yet arise w.r.t. .nyc. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://livestream.com/internetsocietychapters/video?clipId=pla_3b920184-f5b7-4da0-b0fc-ac870008f59b is dead. 74.71.192.180 (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was some back and forth in the ICANN community objection process. It isn't mentioned in the article thus far, but it can be found here. Wwwhatsup (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just noticed that Tom Lowenhauopt extensively documented the Advisory Board's activities on the Coactivate website. https://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/community-advisory-board is the depature point. This should be digested and added to the article. Wwwhatsup (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/community-advisory-board is dead. 74.71.192.180 (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]