This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Islam: Muslim history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Muslim history task force (assessed as High-importance). Spain Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Middle Ages: Crusades Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Crusades task force. Arab world Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesFormer countries Anthropology: Oral tradition This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

I've done a bit of trimming in the lead. Length-wise, I think it's more or less fine as is. There are many paragraphs but they're pretty short, so they could simply do with a bit of merging and some more efficient wording, if needed. From a rough count, it has just over half the number of words as the lead of World War II, a GA article, and in terms of information, I find it hard to image any significant portions that could be trimmed without sacrificing essential information. If anything, the lead might also deserve a quick mention of its architectural legacy, given that this is the main physical and visual remnant of this period today (though I may be biased by my personal interests in that regard!). But feel free to discuss. R Prazeres (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged the second and third paras, which work ok together, and removed the segue into Islamic taxation, which is generic info for Islamic realms and not specific to the subject. Now it's the requisite four paragraphs. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that looks fine to me. A line about Christians and especially Jewish communities under Muslim rule might still be warranted, given their importance to the topic, but maybe more so on their specific cultural development in this period rather than their taxation and legal status which, as you rightly point out, is common to the rest of the Islamic world. R Prazeres (talk) 22:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - the note about Jewish communities should restored as it's a primary aspect of the topic. Andre🚐 03:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Goldfinch12 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Curious Shrimp, Bandzvlad.

— Assignment last updated by Bumblebeatrice (talk) 19:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One would think that whoever is supposed to be supervising these students would ensure that they understand how to properly format text and references, as well as Wikipedia guidelines on style and tone, before letting them loose on articles where they may waste their time and that of other editors with edits that will be promptly reverted. I suspect that many of these "supervisors" don't know the basics of Wikipedia editing themselves. Carlstak (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it looks like it also lacks citations for some of its claims, and also sets a deviant tone in a otherwise more 'family friendly' article, imo. there appears to be no other section or paragraph devoted to the private sexual habits of its citizens or ruling segment under 'culture', whether alleged or otherwise, other than under that title. 12.146.12.12 (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section on science mentions "exposure of scientists to translations of older Greek and Persian works during that time". What Persian older works were translated? The Britannica article doesn't mention anything about Persian works. It's a well-known fact that works of science were first translated in the Muslim East starting in the 9th century from Greek, occasionally Indian sources (sometimes through the intermediacy of Syriac), and in Al-Andalus later from Latin. To the best of knowledge, there is no mention of scientific works translated from Persian, especially in Al-Andalus. Is there any support for this claim? 2603:7081:5D00:385C:8CE2:D7B0:958A:AEB6 (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is mentioned explicitly by the other cited source ([1]), and it's a pretty common thing mentioned about Islamic scientific culture more generally. In the meantime, I've improved the citations and the rest of the paragraph a little by removing Britannica and adding a more reliable and specialized reference ([2]). R Prazeres (talk) 00:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @POTDL, regarding this (and [3]): it is very easy to verify that both the Almoravids and Almohads had their capital at Marrakesh throughout their time in power, aside from their earliest years during their initial conquests, and crucially throughout the respective periods where they controlled al-Andalus. Since the domination of al-Andalus by two back-to-back empires from the same region in North Africa is a major shift in the history of al-Andalus and is described in the article, this is an important point to include in the lead and there is no reason to remove it. If you think there's another wording that would serve the same purpose better, feel free to discuss it here, but please do not remove this information again without consensus (see relevant policies WP:CONSENSUS and WP:EDITWAR). R Prazeres (talk) 22:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]