Content deleted Content added
Sa.vakilian (talk | contribs) →Sources: It should be checked case by case |
Sa.vakilian (talk | contribs) m →Sources: m |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
* '''Only for regime positions''' - considering bias issues with Western sources, these remain considerably different from issues (risk of imprisonment / execution) with current IRI-controlled sources, particularly with regards to the MEK. [[User:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]] ([[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|talk]]) 17:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
* '''Only for regime positions''' - considering bias issues with Western sources, these remain considerably different from issues (risk of imprisonment / execution) with current IRI-controlled sources, particularly with regards to the MEK. [[User:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]] ([[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|talk]]) 17:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
* '''It should be checked case by case''': Surprisingly, prohibition of using any Iranian media is in line with those who want to censor media and against Wikipedia's basic idea. With few exception, almost every book can be published in Iran even atheistic works such as [[Karl Marx]]'s [[German Ideology]] and [[Richard Dawkins]]'s The [[Blind watchmaker]]. There are newspapers and authors with different views in Iran and it is unfair to prohibit using their works and ideas because of the Iran's Media Law and the Government's regulations. It is strange if we can not use the idea of any Iranian internal opposition in Wikipedia just because he/she lives and works in Iran such as [[Davoud Hermidas-Bavand]]. On the other hand, it is against [[WP:NPOV]] to prohibit usage of the Iranian's state media. Either, it is the viewpoint of a considerable block of society or at least significant minority. |
* '''It should be checked case by case''': Surprisingly, prohibition of using any Iranian media is in line with those who want to censor media and against Wikipedia's basic idea. With few exception, almost every book can be published in Iran even atheistic works such as [[Karl Marx]]'s [[German Ideology]] and [[Richard Dawkins]]'s The [[Blind watchmaker]]. There are newspapers and authors with different views in Iran and it is unfair to prohibit using their works and ideas because of the Iran's Media Law and the Government's regulations. It is strange if we can not use the idea of any Iranian internal opposition in Wikipedia just because he/she lives and works in Iran such as [[Davoud Hermidas-Bavand]]. On the other hand, it is against [[WP:NPOV]] to prohibit usage of the Iranian's state media. Either, it is the viewpoint of a considerable block of society or at least significant minority. This idea is similar to prohibition of using France's Media and authors due to [[Gayssot Act]] or BBC because it is operates under a [[Royal Charter]].--<samp>[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</samp> 03:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
This idea is similar to prohibition of using France's Media and authors due to [[Gayssot Act]] or BBC because it is operates under a [[Royal Charter]].--<samp>[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</samp> 03:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{collapse top|Side conversation about France}} |
{{collapse top|Side conversation about France}} |
Revision as of 03:17, 3 August 2018
Main Page | Talk Page | Assessment | To-do | Recognized Content |
Members | Deletion Sorting | Embassy | Portal:Iran |
- ^ Noam Chomsky (2002). ""The Fate of an Honest Intellectual"". Understanding Power. The New Press. pp. 244–248.
{{cite book}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help)
You must be logged in to post a comment.