Hello, Frank, it has been a while. How are things with you? I have nominated this list for FLC and would certainly appreciate your comments here.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FrB.TG. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 10. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Scarlett Johansson has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the FAC.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• A popular contemporary recording artist, she is known for experimenting with new musical ideas and images and for her unconventionality and provocative work.

This is straying into POV, though? Saying that she is "known" for this is an absolutely huge claim to make and it's not based in fact whatsoever. It's a normative claim and it reeks of positive bias. We all love LG and want to portray her well but that isn't neutral. And regardless, it's kinda legacy section material anyway? Wikipedia should not open articles with opinionated, subjective and likely biased sweeping statements. 333cale (talk) 04:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To say an artist is known for doing certain type of work is in no way POV. It is a fact that Gaga constantly experiments with new musical ideas and images (notice how different each of her albums is) and is known for her unconventionality (e.g. her outlandish fashion sense) and provocative work, and these are properly discussed and sourced in appropriate sections and paragraphs. Just like Marilyn Monroe was known for being a sex symbol for much of her life and Meryl Streep is known for her superior acting method, Gaga is known for what she is known. – FrB.TG (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FrB.TG. How are you? I was wondering if you would possibly have time and interest to look at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Breeders Tour 2014/archive1. If you don't, no worries. Thanks for considering, Moisejp (talk) 04:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I suppose that would be great. The sections in List of Lady Gaga live performances are the ones I was/am considering using, but I like the performances cronologically. Johnnyboytoy (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FrB.TG, do you think you'll have any time to read over Three Sisters (Oregon)? I was hoping to bring it to FAC soon, but I wanted to get a few more pairs of eyes to read over it and give me feedback to fine-tune the prose first. I would love if you could provide me with some feedback. ceranthor 00:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I hope you are having a wonderful day so far. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide comments on my current FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sévérine/archive1? Thank you either way and good luck with your projects both on and off Wikipedia. Aoba47 (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just have a question this time. Margaret will appear in a short film which has a poster, will be shown in a cinema (one cinema - limited release) etc. however, it will also serve as a music video for two cuts from her album. the film is titled after the songs and will most likely focus on them, which technically speaking makes it a music video. However, she calls it a short film. It will be shown in a cinema, people will have to buy tickets to see it etc. What would you classify it as then? a film or a music video. and do you think it is worth being mention in the article about her ? ArturSik (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest adding a sentence about it in her article. You should note there that it is a short film but will also serve as a music video for the cuts. FrB.TG (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

will do that.thank you. ArturSik (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: okay so i've added the information, do you think it looks okay? + should I include it in her music videos list or her filmography or both ? ArturSik (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your comments as always, Frank. This is my first attempt at a Hollywood film accolades list BTW.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have had enough reviewers there I think. Good luck. FrB.TG (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are willing, you can comment here too.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:18, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. FrB.TG (talk) 07:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	It's always great to edit and review your great articles. Keep up the good work. John (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks and I look forward to your review of Gaga. FrB.TG (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It was a really complicated FAC and article to take on. FrB.TG (talk) 17:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! on your recent success FrB.TG. Keep excelling. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thabk you. FrB.TG (talk) 06:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Excellent work, buddy. (I should also congratulate you in advance for Lady Gaga. I'll put on "Judas" at full blast to celebrate. :)) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gaga being FA is kinda like my whole purpose in Wikipedia :D so let’s keep our fingers crossed. FrB.TG (talk) 06:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Another FA for us and IndianBio! Thank you both for helping me get Stefani to where she is now!! Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hurrah! It is finally promoted and seems like my purpose on Wikipedia is now complete. :D FrB.TG (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I love how you accomplished a major goal (which is big for me too), I hope this doesn't mean you'll be leaving anytime soon. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not. I just meant this was my goal almost from the beginning of my time here. FrB.TG (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK that's quite a relief! Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo! Congratulations to all three of you. As promised, I'm now Judas-ing. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, glad you’re keeping your promise. :D FrB.TG (talk) 18:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations to the three of you. It was a pleasure to watch this article improve to the FA level. ceranthor 21:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I’m much grateful for all your help during the PR. FrB.TG (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The featured barnstar
	Congratulations to you, IndianBio and SNUGGUMS for promoting Lady Gaga to FA! A remarkable feat indeed!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 13:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is probably my best achievement on Wikipedia. :) FrB.TG (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations FrB.TG! I'm almost emotional watching a high-profile artcile go through FAC rather smoothly. Remarkable work. 🖖 NumerounovedantTalk 17:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Well, it did go through PRs, help from admins and revamps to be where it is now, but you’re right. Cheers. FrB.TG (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relish the Glory. xD NumerounovedantTalk 18:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrB.TG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your comments as always here, Frank. Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Hrithik Roshan article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 10, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 10, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, when I was doing the blurb, I forgot to check TFAR. - Dank (push to talk) 16:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, thank you anyway. FrB.TG (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FrB.TG,

I'm writing to ask whether you would consider having a look at the article. I'm aware that you've been involved with a few PRs before. I've given it a major rewrite and complete overhaul. I began working on the article late October when it looked like this and somehow ended up rewriting the whole thing and aiming for potentially FA. This isn't a process I've been through before, but I have been reading the reviews here in preparation, and am familiar with FAC demands. I would very much appreciate a fresh set of eyes and happily address any concerns you may have.

Thanks! Pseud 14 (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]