Talk:Adam Johnson (footballer): Difference between revisions
I don't believe he belongs on Wikipedia Yorkshire project - he only spent a month on loan in Yorkshire. |
194.83.24.17 (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{sub judice UK}} |
{{sub judice UK}} |
||
I think it's clear he didn't do anything wrong the girls after his money and a bit of fame |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=C|sports-priority=Low|sports-work-group=yes|listas=Johnson, Adam}} |
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=C|sports-priority=Low|sports-work-group=yes|listas=Johnson, Adam}} |
||
Revision as of 13:09, 17 February 2016
Template:Sub judice UK I think it's clear he didn't do anything wrong the girls after his money and a bit of fame
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Club
This article is semi-protected, so could someone change his current club to Manchester City? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.194.128 (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Relegation and 2009-10 season
The Cardiff game was played on 13 December 2009, not 12th. It moved as it was live on Sky. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.107.130 (talk) 09:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Adam Johnson (footballer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071220021646/http://www.watfordfc.premiumtv.co.uk:80/page/NewsDetail/0,,10400~1111916,00.html to http://www.watfordfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10400~1111916,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Child sex charge
The article should specify wether the girl was an actual child or just a teenager below the UK's age of consent. How old was she at the time of the alledged events.
Done She was 15. Jim Michael (talk) 18:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. The readers will be relieved to know he didn't rape a toddler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.27.46.203 (talk) 18:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Technically still under the child sex laws Philb1984 (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2016
In the first paragraph, the word "child" should be replaced with "under age", this should also apply to any subsequent references to the word "child" Jlambton (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- The source says child, even though sexual activity with a 16- or 17-year-old child in the UK (apart from if a teacher or similar position of care) is perfectly legal '''tAD''' (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- The text in question has since been edited and the introduction states the girl's age. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 11:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Infobox - the guy's currently a free agent - am I allowed to put that on his Infobox or not?
I did earlier on but it got deleted and no explanation was given. At the moment it's confusing and in theory anybody could click on the page, read the Infobox, and presume that he still plays for Sunderland Huddsblue (talk) 00:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- 'Free agent' isn't a club, so it shouldn't be in the infobox. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
That seems extremely pedantic tbh. 'Free Agent' is the standard description on a Wikipedia Infobox for a player without a club. Huddsblue (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Is it, though? Mattythewhite (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I believe so, yes. His Infobox doesn't currently make it clear whether he's currently playing for a club or not Huddsblue (talk) 02:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The infobox follows the standard convention for footballers (and I think most sportspeople). If there's an end date on a player's time at a club (which there is for Sunderland) the player has left that club; if there's no end date (it says for example 2013–) then the players is still at the club. So the infobox as is states that he left Sunderland in 2016 (which he did). There's no need to put 'free agent' (particularly as it's not clear if he is - would he sign for a club if they offered him a deal tomorrow? I don't really know). I'd suggest raising this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football if you want to explore whether this is clear or not. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 11:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

