Talk:Martin Luther King Jr.: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Martin Luther King, Jr./Archive 9) (bot
Randy Kryn (talk | contribs)
comment
Line 91: Line 91:
IS this Lead material: ''He was born Michael King but his father, Martin Luther King, Sr., changed his name in honor of German 16th century Protestant reformer Martin Luther.'' Is this MLK,jr info you must have if you only could read this lead?--[[User:Inayity|Inayity]] ([[User talk:Inayity|talk]]) 14:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
IS this Lead material: ''He was born Michael King but his father, Martin Luther King, Sr., changed his name in honor of German 16th century Protestant reformer Martin Luther.'' Is this MLK,jr info you must have if you only could read this lead?--[[User:Inayity|Inayity]] ([[User talk:Inayity|talk]]) 14:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
:No, especially since it's crap, at least according to his father, who said he named him Martin from the start, but the recording doctor assumed he was Michael Jr. [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 16:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
:No, especially since it's crap, at least according to his father, who said he named him Martin from the start, but the recording doctor assumed he was Michael Jr. [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 16:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
::I think I may have fixed it by editing the sentence to make it shorter, with more clarity (compare the above "before" with: '''Named "Michael" at birth, King's father changed his son's name in honor of the 16th century Protestant reformer, [[Martin Luther]].''' I don't know enough about the circumstances of the name, what do major sources say? If Dr. King's birth certificate name was other than 'Martin Luther King' then a mention is not out of order, and hopefully polishing can smooth the sentence language. [[user:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] 2:37 3 February, 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:37, 3 February 2015

Template:Vital article

Good articleMartin Luther King Jr. has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 30, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 17, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 25, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
January 24, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of September 10, 2006.
Current status: Good article

Template:Not a forum

Personal life

I've heard he was sexually promiscuous.

What truth if any in this?

See this: http://www.ibtimes.com/martin-luther-king-cheated-his-wife-other-lesser-known-facts-about-civil-rights-leader-mlk-day Fletcherbrian (talk) 06:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That subject is already covered; see the article, section 11. Kierzek (talk) 20:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


OK, thank you. Fletcherbrian (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MLK Jr Bio

On Martin Luther King Jr the cointelpro stuff is just speculation that it followed him his whole life. Can it be deleted from his intro summary? Which is: " J. Edgar Hoover considered him a radical and made him an object of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's COINTELPRO for the rest of his life." Thank you Inferno360n (talk) 22:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Cross posted from User talk:Inferno360n as this page is also semi-protected. Nick (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Info seems to be reliably sourced in the relevant section Martin Luther King, Jr.#FBI and King's personal life Cannolis (talk) 01:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is properly cited information/fact per WP:RS in the main article and should remain in the WP:Lead as that is a summary of main article content. Kierzek (talk) 13:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The name thing is it really Lead material?

IS this Lead material: He was born Michael King but his father, Martin Luther King, Sr., changed his name in honor of German 16th century Protestant reformer Martin Luther. Is this MLK,jr info you must have if you only could read this lead?--Inayity (talk) 14:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, especially since it's crap, at least according to his father, who said he named him Martin from the start, but the recording doctor assumed he was Michael Jr. --jpgordon::==( o ) 16:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think I may have fixed it by editing the sentence to make it shorter, with more clarity (compare the above "before" with: Named "Michael" at birth, King's father changed his son's name in honor of the 16th century Protestant reformer, Martin Luther. I don't know enough about the circumstances of the name, what do major sources say? If Dr. King's birth certificate name was other than 'Martin Luther King' then a mention is not out of order, and hopefully polishing can smooth the sentence language. Randy Kryn 2:37 3 February, 2015 (UTC)