Content deleted Content added
Flyingstar16 (talk | contribs)
m More Birth Date Speculation: Forgot a couple square brackets :|
69.110.90.230 (talk)
Line 33: Line 33:


::: It might be.. Even though, someone with more knowledge than me should do the math: if "Class of 2000" means that she graduated from secondary school in 2000 and, according to [[Secondary_school#Canada]] she was 18/19 when she graduated, this means that (2000-18/19) = she was born in 1982/1981.. Suggestions? --[[User:Flyingstar16|Flyingstar16]] ([[User talk:Flyingstar16|talk]]) 23:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
::: It might be.. Even though, someone with more knowledge than me should do the math: if "Class of 2000" means that she graduated from secondary school in 2000 and, according to [[Secondary_school#Canada]] she was 18/19 when she graduated, this means that (2000-18/19) = she was born in 1982/1981.. Suggestions? --[[User:Flyingstar16|Flyingstar16]] ([[User talk:Flyingstar16|talk]]) 23:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

::::Yes. That date is already given. [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section)]], quoting:<blockquote> "The lead should ...define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is ''interesting or notable'', and summarize the most important points—including ''any prominent controversies''." ..."consideration should be given to ''creating interest'' in reading more of the article," </blockquote> Isn't this secrete-keeping both interesting and notable? I wonder if "any prominent controversies," sorta implies prominent discrepancies, oddities, and the like? I think so. <br> --[[Special:Contributions/69.110.90.230|69.110.90.230]] ([[User talk:69.110.90.230|talk]]) 17:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Doug Bashford


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 17:10, 8 May 2013

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Born in 1996?

According to the current sources, it says that she was born on May 17, 1996, but it seems unlikely that this information is correct, she is probably older than that. Are those sources reliable? --Carioca (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She is quite clearly older than 16, and it should be noted that she posed topless for GQ, something that would be much more controversial if she were a minor. I think 1996 is a typo or a mistake that has then propagated because it's from the only easy to find article that mentions her birth year. Other sources that probably got the information from the same article shouldn't be used to verify this. Urbanski (talk) 20:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I fully agree with you. The current sources clearly are not reliable. Her birth year should be removed until someone finds more reliable sources. --Carioca (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This story notes that her age is "a closely guarded secret" - but also says she is in her 20s. The 1996 date is clearly wrong. [Winipeg Free Press|http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/entertainment/TV/no-trick-all-treat-64901022.html] 184.99.126.31 (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Further evidence the date is wrong. On her Twitter feed, she says "Thanks for the b-day love everyone" on Feb 20. I am removing the birthdate information. --EricE (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For the sake of precision, Spiridakos did not pose "topless" and the pictures in GQ would be legal if she were 16. That said I beleive she is in her early 20's.72.75.27.134 (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
She graduated from École Secondaire Oak Park High School in 2000 http://www.pembinatrails.ca/oakpark/Info/Newsletters/June.pdf Krawhitham (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Family Village Not on Cephalonia

I knew the family back in Greece, and and they have no connection to Kephalonia. They are from Lakonia (as in the Sparta, Peloponnese area) and she lived in Laconia. The article linked to a town in Kephalonia and that is not correct. She is from the Sparta area like just Helen of the Iliad).72.75.27.134 (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More Birth Date Speculation

The latest incarnation of a birth date was added as February 14, 1988 by ‎ 173.219.160.225 on 18 September 2012. While the date is believable, it is uncited and therefore should not be in the article as it may be possibly only speculative. Per the Winnepeg Free Press article above, she apparently intends for the date to be secret. Cite it reliably, or leave it out. --EricE (talk) 21:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the birth date needs a reliable source. --Carioca (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The only reliable source I've seen is the The Globe and Mail, which published her age as 24, which I cited inline. There have been a couple stories in gossip magazines that she graduated high school in the class of 2000, making her 29 or 30, but unless published by a reliable source, it shouldn't be added. dissolvetalk 18:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found an entry on Listal[1] that seems to confirm February 14, 1988 as her birthdate, though I'm not sure if it can be considered an official source. Anyone have opinions about that site? --Flyingstar16 (talk) 15:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But a person she follows[2] on Twitter wished her a happy birthday on February 20th[3] (I'm going to hell for this :| ) --Flyingstar16 (talk) 16:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Listal, from the 'about' page[1] appears to be user-generated content, as is Twitter, so both would be considered self-published sources. The policy for biographies of living persons is to 'never use self-published sources'. The gossip article source I mentioned "Just How Old Is "Revolution" Star Tracy" questions the validity of her being 25. Per WP:DOB, her date of birth shouldn't be included in the article unless published widely by reliable sources. dissolvetalk 18:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is a school newsletter a reliable source? http://www.pembinatrails.ca/oakpark/Info/Newsletters/June.pdf Krawhitham (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It might be.. Even though, someone with more knowledge than me should do the math: if "Class of 2000" means that she graduated from secondary school in 2000 and, according to Secondary_school#Canada she was 18/19 when she graduated, this means that (2000-18/19) = she was born in 1982/1981.. Suggestions? --Flyingstar16 (talk) 23:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. That date is already given. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section), quoting:

"The lead should ...define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies." ..."consideration should be given to creating interest in reading more of the article,"

Isn't this secrete-keeping both interesting and notable? I wonder if "any prominent controversies," sorta implies prominent discrepancies, oddities, and the like? I think so.
--69.110.90.230 (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

References

No tags for this post.