U2 (inactive)
This page is within the scope of WikiProject U2, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.U2Wikipedia:WikiProject U2Template:WikiProject U2U2

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join the discussion on the talk page!   Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)! [reply]

You may add yourself to our meber list below by clicking

Miss Bono (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the members list as seen here. We could message the reaming people see if they have any interested in updateing the affiliated articles.Moxy (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Join the discussion to input the Wikiproject. It's been a while since it might be consider as inactive and there're a lot of things to do around here.Miss Bono (talk) 13:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Miss Bono: please, add a wiki link to this discussion within your future messages and also a wlink to this talk page in the {{Project U2 member ping}} template,[done] in order to make it easier to access to this discussion and to the WP talk page[done]. Thank you. And, YES, this is the right place for opening a discussion on how to revamp WikiProject U2.

One thing I have noticed is that, although Wikipedia is a community and it should be based on teamwork and collaborations, many WikiProjects (WPs) are disused. You know, WPs' aims and goals are to improve, mantain, and update articles about this or that subject. So now the questions are:

1. What are the tasks that need to be delivered?
2. How can a member of the WP participate, contribute, and help the project?

Point #1, WP's tasks, aims, and goals are in the WP's main page. Are there any new tasks, new things to do, that can be covered by this WP?
About point #2, membership and contributing to the project, a drive (for example for reassessing articles) should be a temporary "buffer solution", but its effect would disappear within a couple of months. How about inviting members to adopt one or more articles? Also, making one ore more articles the collaboration(s) of the week, fortnight, or month, with the goal of improving Stub-Start-C Class articles's quality, but also to cleanup, add sources, wikify (fixing issues related to WikiSyntax), and expand articles aren't a bad idea.
I will check out if there are currently active editors who are editing articles belonging to this WP, and (eventually) send them invitations to join this project or messages.
Cheers. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bono and The Edge appear to be still not of GA status. I think getting both those articles there should be this Project's primary aim for now. Any thoughts (on whether or not to do it; or how to do it) or anyone willing to give in a hand for the same? If 2-3 of us can get together, both these articles will be there in no time. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put my name down for it! :P  

Miss Bono (zootalk) 16:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like it wouldn't take a whole lot of work to bring Bono to GA status. I am willing to work on it. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]