Content deleted Content added
Assessed for WikiProject Cryptozoology as low importance |
Dysmorodrepanis~enwiki (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Cryptids|class=C|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Cryptids|class=C|importance=low}} |
||
{{BirdTalk|class=C|importance=Low}} |
{{BirdTalk|class=C|importance=Low}} |
||
==Reconstruction, relationships of ''Fregilupus'' etc== |
|||
See ''[[Sturnia]]''. For a reconstruction, it is presently most warranted to merge the body form of ''[[Fregilupus]]'', ''[[Sturnia sinensis]]'', ''[[Sturnia malabarica]]'' and perhaps ''[[Leucopsar]]'' (too highly arboreal?). The skull/beak must be taken as template (do not forget horny sheath) and the limb proportions too. Then adapt the generalized ''"Sturnia"'' (of the old definition) color pattern to the description of Tafforet. [[User:Dysmorodrepanis|Dysmorodrepanis]] ([[User talk:Dysmorodrepanis|talk]]) 18:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:00, 4 December 2011
![]() | Cryptozoology C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Reconstruction, relationships of Fregilupus etc
See Sturnia. For a reconstruction, it is presently most warranted to merge the body form of Fregilupus, Sturnia sinensis, Sturnia malabarica and perhaps Leucopsar (too highly arboreal?). The skull/beak must be taken as template (do not forget horny sheath) and the limb proportions too. Then adapt the generalized "Sturnia" (of the old definition) color pattern to the description of Tafforet. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.