Talk:National liberalism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
WP:POLC using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{oldafdfull| date = 30 October 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = National liberalism }}
{{oldafdfull| date = 30 October 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = National liberalism }}
{{WikiProject Liberalism|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Political culture|liberalism=yes|class=stub|importance=low}}


==Merge with [[Liberalism]]?==
==Merge with [[Liberalism]]?==

Revision as of 03:59, 12 September 2011

Template:WikiProject Political culture

Merge with Liberalism?

I strongly oppose any merger with Liberalism with thi page as a redirect. "National liberalism" is a specific brand of "liberalism" and there are pleny of sources to testify that. The article needs to be improved, but definitely "national liberalism" deserves a separate article. --Checco (talk) 21:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you kindly provide one source that "National liberalism" is a specific brand of "liberalism" as opposed to a name used by some liberal parties. The Four Deuces (talk) 21:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article, which needs to be improved (on this we can agree), has plenty of sources, some even very specific, so please stop deleting the page by redirecting it. As you know there are different brands of liberalism (as also conservatism and other ideologies have) and this is one of them. The term "national liberalism" reflects a brand of liberalism, present especially in German-speaking countries, that has some "national" flavour. It has its own history and deserves a separate article. --Checco (talk) 06:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again could you please provide a single source supporting that view. It appears to be original research. The Four Deuces (talk) 07:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have started a discussion threat at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard questioning the only source used to define this article's subject.[1]. The Four Deuces (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]