The link I removed had nothing to do with Playhouse Square Center. I resent the tone of your edit summary, but thank you for adding a relevant link. --Confiteordeo (talk) 20:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok tnx, maybe I'll add something about the name in the main article. --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your good guy. Thanks greatly for your contribution to Good Night, Paul especially figuring out those last external links. There's a lot to learn for me on these wiki articles. T —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjt48 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied again to your message. Here it is below:

Ok, I will take your word for that, you seem to know have a better knowledge than me in this area. I did not realize it had to be a theatre built within those dates. I guess, I was misunderstanding the actual definition of a palace theatre. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.WackoJackO 05:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reinstated the anecdote on the Toscanini page. It was in one of Harvey Sachs' books. I've listed a citation request and will add the reference when I get home.THD3 (talk) 10:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Markhh (talk) 05:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you are also working on the discographies, which is great. My understanding is that we are not using the Amazon ASIN numbers on WP, because they are commercial and we are not supporting any particular retailer. Is that your understanding? Best. --Kleinzach 08:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is my understanding and I don't use them, but previous editors have posted them. Mostly I have focused on the Tosca page so far. But when I get a chance to expand some of the other pages I'll replace the Amazon mumbers with catalog numbers when I can. Markhh (talk) 06:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Kleinzach 07:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. NEVER try to "move" a page by copy and pasting what other people wrote to another title. That messes up article history, and removes the required attribution of who wrote what. What to do then if you think something should be at another title? See Help:Moving a page. Hope this helps. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. It looks like you're familiar with the "move page" function and have used it in the past-- good! But you also sometimes did "copy and paste" pseudo moves-- not good! Please be sure to use the "move page" function consistantly when moving an article-- especially any article that contains any text or work by someone other than yourself. I undid your moves of the Saenger Theatre articles for New Orleans and Pensacola. You may be correct that another title would be better; I undid simply to clean up/restore article history, per Wikipedia policy. See the comment I left at Talk:New Orleans Saenger Theatre. Thanks for your work. If you have questions about Wikipedia policies and practices you can't find an answer for, ask. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Sorry for the screw up. Markhh (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a connection to this organization?--RadioFan (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not officially, although I have known it as a friend and volunteer since its inception. Markhh (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This still sounds like a bit of a conflict of interest to me. I'm going to place some information below on COI, This can be cleared up likely by following it's instructions to declare your connection with the organization.--RadioFan (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Columbus Association for the Performing Arts, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no association with the organization except the interest of local citizen. Although I have been a volunteer in the past, I have not been so connected for over a decade.Markhh (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1999 11월 MEGABOX Cineplex와 LCE간의 전략적 제휴

The first Megabox was launched in COEX Mall in Samseong Dong (Seoul, South Korea) in 2000

References:

• http://www.megabox.co.kr/megabox/history.aspx Template:Korean requires |hangul= parameter.
• Megabox (movie theatres)

The title of the article is "Fox Theatre (Fullerton, California)" - there is no other use for that title. Nobody can accidentally stumble across this article, so there's no need for a note at the top. That's the purpose of disambiguating titles. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 19:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouraging note. It's going to FAC later today, after I've given it a final read-through. Brianboulton (talk) 12:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions on the Mark Hellinger Theatre. They were good.

Would you please take a look at some other articles about theatres that I have worked on and let me know if you have any suggestions on those? These include the Lyric Theatre (New York), the Neil Simon Theatre, and the Westside Theatre. There are more, but those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.

Thanks. JGKlein (talk) 07:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments on my work on What's My Line. I don't wish to impose, but, if you'd have the time, do you have any opinions/suggestions on what could still be improved. It still is missing some important citations which I'm going to try to fix. However, do you think it's still too long? Do you think there's anything that's not "encyclopedic"? These were the main criticisms before I stated working on it. Thanks, BashBrannigan (talk) 17:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a number concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Chicago Theatre/GA1. You are being nominated as you have more than 7 non-minor edits to the article. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages exist solely to discuss improvements to articles. Discussion of the topics themselves are off-topic, such as this one.[1] For more information, see WP:TALK#Others' comments: "Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:... Deleting material not relevant to improving the article..."   Will Beback  talk  05:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many policies, guidelines, and essays, and they change so frequently, that no one knows them all. It's embarassing when I quote such a page only to find it's changed since I looked at it. Anyway, just a minot point. Cheers.   Will Beback  talk  08:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The reason why it was removed is that a copyright image needs a separate fair use rationale for each article it's used in. I suspect it will keep being removed from the article, unless you add a separate fair use rationale to the file page for its use in Carmen. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC) (Ps. Thanks for removing all that drecky trivia. Voceditenore (talk) 08:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Markhh! Several categories related to music competition winners are being targetted, and I think it would be useful that you give your opinion regarding the neccesity (or not) of these categories and maybe later help proposing changes to the present guidelines (music awards and prizes). Category:Primrose International Viola Competition prize-winners has been already deleted. The categories proposed for deletion are #Category:Prize-winners of the Leeds International Pianoforte Competition, #category:Prize-winners of the Paloma O'Shea Piano Competition, #Category:Operalia, #Category:Ferruccio Busoni International Piano Competition and #Category:Prize-winners of the Besançon Conducting Competition. Cheers.--Karljoos (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edits! I've had a pile of Lucia books sitting here for months and I'm finally going to fix up and expand the article. I'd appreciate any help you're willing to provide along with way, including keeping me honest with terms like "opera expert". --Andy Walsh (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to "correct" the spelling of something when doing a page move, you really should check to make sure you have the spelling correct first.—Chowbok ☠ 05:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. Please see my reply here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:American_Ballet_Theatre

Thanks. 38.109.88.196 (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have moved a number of theater articles from "Theater xxx (city)" to "Theater xxx (city, state)", citing reasons of standard U.S. theater disambiguation in the edit summary. Can you expand on your reasoning for doing this?

I can see the reason if the same theater name is used in two cities of the same name, but beyond that rare instance (such as the State Theater in Portland, Oregon, and the State Theater in Portland, Maine), the city by itself would be enough to disambiguate.

Even if your "(city, state)" renaming effort were accepted as the right way to do it, the theater articles do not all reflect this naming style. Some apparently get a pass, such as Palladium (New York City) which for some reason did not get moved to Palladium (New York, New York). The Hollywood Palladium has not been moved to Palladium (Hollywood, California) or Palladium (Los Angeles, California). Others get to 'own' the main article title even though other theaters of the same name are pushed to "(city, state)" disambiguations. The Paradise Theater in the Bronx does not have a parenthetical title even though Paradise Theatre (Chicago, Illinois) does. The Lyric Theatre (New York) has only the city (or is it the state?). Similarly, the following non-U.S. articles seem to buck the overarching format for the U.S. articles: Lyric Theatre (London), Lyric Theatre (Belfast), Lyric Theatre, Dublin and Lyric Theatre, Sydney. Finally, the boroughs of New York City are often accorded a status equal to that of a city, as in Kings Theatre (Brooklyn, New York), when it is actually Kings Theatre (New York, New York).

All of this is because the Harris Theater (Chicago, Illinois) is up for FAC, and I question why listing the state is necessary, as there is really only one 'Chicago' worth noting. I would like to see a very well thought-out reason. Binksternet (talk) 04:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I personally find the City, state thing totally unnecessary and a little irritating when searching for things. With categories too. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revert at Metropolitan Opera: please consider WP:REPEATLINK, especially the first bullet point: "where a later occurrence of an item is a long way from the first." I suggest you revert your revert. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks for your comment. Markhh (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mark. I think some articles wikified to the NBC Orchestra are in fact supposed to go to the NBCSO. You might want to check the "what links here". Cheers.4meter4 (talk) 19:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I checked all of the links. Most of them were correct, but I made changes where necessary. There was an in-house orchestra at NBC prior to and separate from the NBCSO with some members belonging to both. There seems to be no one name for this. Sometimes its referred to as the NBC Orchestra, sometimes the NBC staff orchestra, and the NBC house orchestra. NBC also had a West Coast studio with its own in-house band, to add to the confusion. But for sure, most references to the "NBC Orchestra" are about the Tonight Show Band. Cheers, Markhh (talk) 19:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mark for taking the time to fix things where needed.4meter4 (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is interesting. I never heard that story before.4meter4 (talk) 20:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help disambiguate the two Boston Opera House into Boston Opera House (1909) and Boston Opera House (1980). --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, excellent changes. It seems most of the articles link to the earlier incarnation. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to this edit, WP:NBSP specifies "12 November" as an example of text that needs an   or a Nowrap template. More explanation here. Art LaPella (talk) 03:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Got it. Markhh (talk) 03:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right - it was an IP. My apologies.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thoughr you might be interested in these Metropolitan Opera Auditions of the Air and Metropolitan Opera National Council Auditions. Cheers.4meter4 (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I spent some time trying to find who added the Pelletier recording that you expunged from the article but gave up. However, Operadis comes up with the goods here and I think you'll agree that it isn't a hoax (unlike the recent spurious additions to Don Giovanni, Faust discography etc. which have been plaguing us recently). SE indicates that the recording is of excerpts and was made in a studio rather than at a performance at the Met. I restored the recording and have added a ref and more detail. Best. --GuillaumeTell 11:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment here. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 06:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! What do you think of the table I setup for the program and credits? I just had to think of a way to incorporate the two together and hopefully it will be the end of that issue. Also, for the Design and animation section, what do you think would be useful information to include? The typical development of a segment from its concept to drawings to the film print? Or the types of animation techniques used, such as the multiplane camera used on the Ave Maria segment, etc? Any thoughts on these or other ways the article can develop for possibly GA? Would like to hear your input! Thank you :) LowSelfEstidle (talk) 08:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]