User:AGK/Notice

• Old messages: User talk:AGK/Archive
• Want a page undeleted? Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion is quicker.

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you said that I said something that is not true, may I please ask you to provide some differences to prove that I repeatedly violated the policy in the topic of my ban? If you'd rather me post the question to AE, just tell me, and I will. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You said that you had "never repeatedly violated policy" in the I/P subject area. You have. Diffs evidencing this can be found within the original AE complaint: nine reverts is a violation of several site policies. If you want to edit a topic as contested as Palestine-Israel, you'll need to learn how to do so whilst collaborating and discussing with other editors and how to know when dispute resolution or the involvement of a neutral administrator is needed. Storming in and blindly reverting another editor with whom you don't agree isn't collaborating; in fact, it's plain disruptive. And that's why you've been banned. An AE thread, two appeals, and screeds of discussions later, I'm struggling to see why you can't comprehend that. AGK 17:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Could you please be more specific what do you mean under "nine reverts". Where did I make them? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing an article on the case; I understand it is in use in Scots law? Would you be interested in helping with the article? Or just sending me a chock-load of Scots journals I can use as sources. Ironholds (talk) 21:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to increase the participation of admins for the appeal(Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_TheDarkLordSeth)? TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 07:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]