Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It was made in the wizard. Thank you. Iongatherer (talk) 04:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is about the same as if you owned the only newspaper in the world, each commanded you what they can and can not write, and yet you said that your country is freedom of speech. You hypocrite, who, like your country (if you're a citizen of the United States) - still say that your country's freedom, while you are on the verge of a fascist dictatorship, which reconciles own people, censors the media manipulates public opinion and all under the guise of protection " freedom " --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed my point. You can create an account at Blogspot. I mean, you can, so don't bring up a hypothetical situation where it would not be possible. That's where your opinions should be stated in accordance with your First Amendment rights. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir. please get a life and stop deleteing my articlesDrkylelambert (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand why you declined the speedy. Could you please explain? The pages appeared to have the exact same title and content. If it is my mistake and I'm missing a policy, I apologize. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One is a plausible redirect to the other. See WP:REDIRECT. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it already, I've admitted I was making it all up twice. --CF90 (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete Paul Dunay? He seems notable and every paragraph in the article is sourced. I worked hard on that article and it seems like everyone hates it. Dharokowns (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All of the references you used only qualify as primary sources. You should try redoing the article from scratch using only references over which neither Dunay nor his publisher, agent, etc. have any control whatsoever. Preferably, such sources should be reputable newspapers, marketing journals, etc. but not in the blog sections. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have some more time to find better sources then? Dharokowns (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion discussion normally lasts seven days. That should give you plenty of time. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've been going through edit filter requests in an effort to clean out stale requests and noticed your outstanding request for the "Rush is Right" sockpuppeteer. Is this issue still ongoing? If so, could you provide some diffs or information on where it's happening so as to identify patterns for the filter? Thanks. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 07:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]