Talk:Clinical psychology: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Update project banners: Neither project has a process for obtaining an A-class rating.
Line 19: Line 19:
|topic=Socsci
|topic=Socsci
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=A|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WPMED|class=A|importance=High}}
{{WPMED|class=B|importance=High}}
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|July - December 2006]]<br/>[[/Archive 2|January - May 2007]]<br/>[[/Archive 3|July 2007 - July 2008]]}}
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|July - December 2006]]<br/>[[/Archive 2|January - May 2007]]<br/>[[/Archive 3|July 2007 - July 2008]]}}



Revision as of 18:33, 19 October 2009

Former good articleClinical psychology was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 23, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconPsychology Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archived

Another talk page archive. Left the GA discussion because someone really should tackle that project. —Ash(talk) 02:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA status

This article has been tagged for well over a month but still hasn't been cited, and still contains lists that amount to original research. Is anyone working on citing the article? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for almost six weeks, no response, delisted GA. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]