Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Dear Blanchardb -

We have updated the Commuity Equity article and would like to get your feedback on the changes/additions. Since Community Equity is an official and active open source project we would like to kindly ask you to remove the Articles for deletion template.

Regards Peterreiser (talk) 13:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blanchardb, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Mysterious Universe - a page you tagged - because: since the previous AFD could not include development afterwards which the article now also cites, a new AFD is probably in order to assess whether notability has changed since 2008. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 08:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What star is it? Peter Horn User talk 00:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like the one I just added to mine. The code is {{click|link=List of bridges to the Island of Montreal|image=LinkFA-star.png|width=15px|height=15px|title=List of bridges to the Island of Montreal}} -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blanchardb,

I tried "copy and paste" but got absolutely nowhere. Please post the actual star on my talk page & I will take it from there. Peter Horn User talk 23:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Peter Horn User talk 00:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blanchardb, Thanks for the speedy deletion patrol for the schema-less model entry. I delete the text and will add more content (and context) in the near future.

Thanks Captchad (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know that I've contested the speedy on this one - I agree that it's borderline, but I'd give a few days for it to develop given the peculiar circumstances. (For more details, see User talk:Mcjakeqcool#Looking for a project and this ANI thread.) Tim Song (talk) 14:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the speedy tag had been removed by the creator. I didn't check the history. No problem, since, in its current state, I've inserted a proposed merger tag instead. No warning was issued, since the concern that led to the speedy tagging was addressed. Thanks for notifying me. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am trying to revise my article of The Titan Agency that got tagged with a speedy deletion message and I am scared to repost my edits because I don't want to be blocked from contributing. I have gone through the guidelines and feel that it now meets the requirements. Do you have any suggestions? How can I make sure it won't get another "speedy deletion" message on it? --Blong728 (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the guidelines we pointed to you were notability guidelines. Which means to say that the problem isn't with the article itself, but with the chosen topic. Notability guidelines are there to let you decide whether or not you should even start an article, and not how that article should be written. See WP:AKON. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blanchardb, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Oidentd has been removed. It was removed by Hm2k with the following edit summary '(a sourceforge link, a freshmean link and an entry in the linux manual; notability is obvious, references can be and will be improved; this is a stub.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Hm2k before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]