Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

I made a request for use of the account creation interface under the name Blanchardb, same as my Wikimedia-wide user name. Confirmation should be sent at my email address (specified on my registration request) on the Videotron server. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blanchardb, thank you for your interest in helping users creating accounts. Your request has been approved. I advise you to read WP:ACCG before you use the system.

At this time, you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day. You won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user. However, if you have reached the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:RPE.

Again, thanks for your interest in the account creation system. Join us on IRC at wikipedia-en-accounts and subscribe to the mailing list by going here. Willking1979 (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey I don't really understand why the article Triagolnik is proposed for deletion ... can you explain me by details... thank you... greetings 1111tomica (talk) 11:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)1111tomica1111tomica (talk) 11:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are no third-party reliable sources used to show that the company meets our notability guidelines. All references are from the company's own website and therefore cannot be used to establish notability. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, After reading your userpage I thought I'd ask if you could lend a hand with Religious response to ART. I've done what I could do understand and explain the Christian perspective but am afraid I don't know enough and may be mis representing ideology. If you (or someone you know) would be so kind as to take a look that would be great. Thanks! Joe407 (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you i will take care of things and get control of that acount back hopefuly not to much damage was done.--Dcheagle (talk) 06:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have passed on the notification to the content creator User:EmilyW, please check in future for the origin of content. Thanks. Fifelfoo (talk) 02:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that :-( -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all; its my suspicion the content can't stand on its own, but it definitely doesn't belong at Generation Z :). Fifelfoo (talk) 04:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to be a newer version of an article that was deleted in the recent past. Since you left a comment on the talk page of the person who created the original article could you please look at this one to see if it should be deleted. Cheers. Ozdaren (talk) 15:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A little note...all radio stations that are FM, AM, or Low Power (LP) are notable. This page should have been cleaned up rather than redirected. I will, using standard templates, recreate the page. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:27, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand the proposed guideline correctly, a college station must have at least a class D license to be considered independently notable. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, it can by any class. There are thousands of stations that are Class A (that is the big class of station) and the smaller class is D (that is the translators and such). You can see the update page at WLKL. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]