Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

3 4 5 6 7

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Please do not delete this page. Their methodology is often sited for its new, innovative polling prediction methodology in the Democratic Primary Election 2008. It gained attention for beating out most pollsters projections in North Carolina and Indiana in the heavily contested political primary race between Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in 2008. New polling methodology in the political world is of enormous economic and political impact. Many major publications have mentioned the site in relationship to the elections.

dummy entry to initiate archiving Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Blachardb -- You are killing me -- would the Applied Sustainability article be ok if I removed the appropedia link?

Thanks--Enviro1 (talk) 01:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you can also show some notability for the concept. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a ton of stuff on applied sustainability on the web -- I put in a good start for both the peer reviewed literature and a bunch of examples of AS centers at universities and in industry -- I think the article is finally up to snuff -- Please drop all deletion requests - Thanks --Enviro1 (talk) 15:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per this edit, I agree that the link you gave is also fine, if you change the wording a bit. An interested reader clicking just the word creation is going to be a little confused. You're hiding too much information in the pipe, so can we change it a bit? Also, it would be polite not to assume bad faith straight up. Cheers, Ben (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I've since had a go at rewording it to incorporate your link. Ben (talk) 12:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

It's no problem. In any case, I still think we need to reword the sentence a little. I've had a go, but do you have any suggestions? Ben (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking care of that. Cheers! --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 00:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

on the Morganville Texas review,i wrote that and you told me it was vandalizm check my ip and everything i just didnt have an account when i wrote it. i wrote that article! check everything i WROTE IT!

Tkstreet (talk) 01:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you probably just saw it while patrolling recent changes, but there's been a lot of vandalism to it lately and it's good to know that others are taking note and helping out there as well, so thanks! ^_^ Rachel Summers (talk) 01:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you defending them? Do you or did you go to school there? Do you or did you work there? What I said is/was true. If you don't like it that is fine, but truth is truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazarenec (talk • contribs) 15:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding potentially libelous comments with no reliable sources. Therefore, they must be considered false a priori and summarily removed. That you say it's true changes nothing. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 15:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You still didn't answer my questions ... do you or did you attend this school ... do you or did you work there?

I've never heard of it before. Which changes nothing, since your comments are potentially libelous. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 15:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will you put this Image on Angel Locsin's article please --> image is Angel Locsin.jpg. Please because im just only a new user here in wikipedia so i cannot edit protected articles hte image was already reviewed and it has already a license. Please forgive me. Thankyou so much! Consciously Unique (talk) 04:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot do it until the image itself is uploaded at . --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 10:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to the proposed deletion nomination you put on this article, please note that the artist's notability is in fact clear. Two of Musiq Soulchild's albums, including his most recent one, have gone to #1 on the Billboard 200, the main album chart in the United States. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check the page history please before you tag something for speedy. Weirdo was a perfectly valid stub on a notable comic before some nutbar vandalized it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]