Wikipedia talk:WikiSpeak: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Dorftrottel (talk | contribs)
Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs)
alphabetical order?: not as far as I'm concerned
Line 10: Line 10:


Casliber sorted the list, but now there are several unsorted entries, starting at Cool Down Blocks. Not sure if they're intentionally unsorted? <big>[[User:Dorftrottel#DT|dor<!-- -->ftrottel]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Dorftrottel|talk]])</big> 16:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Casliber sorted the list, but now there are several unsorted entries, starting at Cool Down Blocks. Not sure if they're intentionally unsorted? <big>[[User:Dorftrottel#DT|dor<!-- -->ftrottel]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Dorftrottel|talk]])</big> 16:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

:Not intentional as far as I'm concerned, I'd prefer alphabetical order. --[[User:Malleus Fatuarum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuarum|talk]]) 17:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:35, 31 May 2008

Would this make more sense in alphabetical order?

I tried that actually, but some of them play off each other, and only make sense for one to follow the other. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I removed the signatures. Or should they all get them? Or none? I prefer none. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer none, but thought Dekeppai (or however it's spelt) might object to my removing his.iridescent 19:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we'll just hafta block Dekkapai then, won't we?  :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dekkappai laughs nervously but politely as he backs away from two armed Admins... Dekkappai (talk) 18:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I'm absolutely crying at my desk right now, these are cracking me up in their truthiness...Iridescent, yours particularly rock. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

alphabetical order?

Casliber sorted the list, but now there are several unsorted entries, starting at Cool Down Blocks. Not sure if they're intentionally unsorted? dorftrottel (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not intentional as far as I'm concerned, I'd prefer alphabetical order. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]