Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

/Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Just a quickie note - It is up to the user what goes on their page. If they add an insult, just blank it. Infuriating as this editor is, it is their right. However, I suspect it won't be long before he gets himself blocked StephenBuxton (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lavigueur family, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you placed a speedydeletion tag on Trophymanager. I feel that it is notable. It has over 100,000 members from at least 139 countries. I'd say that makes it notable. Smartyllama (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article says somewhere between 100 and 1000. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 13:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's just because google translator is terrible. It means "101,000 teams". And if you go to trophymanager's website, you'll see that that's correct. I shall change the mistranslation right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartyllama (talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote, on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Qaida facilitator that your nomination [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAl_Qaida_facilitator&diff=182789594&oldid=182424305 does not in the tradition of good-faith nominations.] Geo Swan (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blanchardb, culling the links is a good thing, and I agree with the activity. A lot of people get defensive over which links should be on a page. However, the link I provided actually makes almost all other links redundant, itself being of more useful in allowing comparisons between the many versions. It has many versions of the bible on one site. Did you explore the link before removing it? If anything, links to other specific versions should be removed in favor of the unbound.com site. Check it out and let me know what you think. We can continue this conversation on the talk page if you feel there is merit. --Fcsuper (talk) 20:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this discussion should be only between the two of us, so I transferred it to Talk:Bible. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 23:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In future could you please give articles 10 minutes? My second edit to the page Peters (bakery) was interupted by your slamming on the tag a mere minute after I began to write it.--Him and a dog 21:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this cannot be done. The New Pages page only gives me the latest 50 pages. You can insert the {{hangon}} tag if you feel you need a few minutes. I follow up on my tags, and sometimes I remove some of my own. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Isotx -- I see its gone now. I feel that it's a pretty notable company, it's been talked about in many magazines, it's won notable awards for its mod, and its producing pretty innovative combinations of genre. It could have been expanded a lot, but not deleted. InterfaceLeader23 (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)InterfaceLeadr23[reply]

The speedy deletion criterion by which your article was deleted was Significance not asserted, that is, one could not have determined, from the article, that it won major awards. This is an important thing to state for the sake of people not familiar with the company. And those who know about the company would like to know that too. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 23:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For adding under construction to Anti-Executable. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 14:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]