Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

/Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Just so you know, I responded on the character list talkpage. -- Mike (Kicking222) 04:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean, but I only translated the article from Portuguese. You can do whatever you want with the article, but I guess that the article of Portuguese should also be nominated for deletion, for it even does not cite a source. Please respond on my talk page. Regards, --  Idontknow610  (WANNA SIGN??) 14:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page per your request. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 14:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does encyclopedia-notable as an interpreter mean? --  Idontknow610  (WANNA SIGN??) 14:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry... :-( The article says the subject is an interpreter. By "encyclopedia-notable", I meant, worthy of consideration for an entry in an encyclopedia. (See Wikipedia:Notability.) I meant to say that, as far as I can tell, no one has become famous for working as an interpreter. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 14:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh :-) --  Idontknow610  (WANNA SIGN??) 14:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi, as you participated 3 weeks ago in the first AfD, you may be interested in this one Pundit|utter 15:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quickie note - It is up to the user what goes on their page. If they add an insult, just blank it. Infuriating as this editor is, it is their right. However, I suspect it won't be long before he gets himself blocked StephenBuxton (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lavigueur family, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you placed a speedydeletion tag on Trophymanager. I feel that it is notable. It has over 100,000 members from at least 139 countries. I'd say that makes it notable. Smartyllama (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article says somewhere between 100 and 1000. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 13:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's just because google translator is terrible. It means "101,000 teams". And if you go to trophymanager's website, you'll see that that's correct. I shall change the mistranslation right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartyllama (talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote, on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Qaida facilitator that your nomination [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAl_Qaida_facilitator&diff=182789594&oldid=182424305 does not in the tradition of good-faith nominations.] Geo Swan (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blanchardb, culling the links is a good thing, and I agree with the activity. A lot of people get defensive over which links should be on a page. However, the link I provided actually makes almost all other links redundant, itself being of more useful in allowing comparisons between the many versions. It has many versions of the bible on one site. Did you explore the link before removing it? If anything, links to other specific versions should be removed in favor of the unbound.com site. Check it out and let me know what you think. We can continue this conversation on the talk page if you feel there is merit. --Fcsuper (talk) 20:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]