Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

/Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Oh dear, my mistake entirely. I apologize. I went ahead and replaced the page with a indefblock notice. I hope this is ok with you. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. --TeaDrinker (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was unable to undo his changes when he completely copied the Oscar Gutierrez page into his as a way to avoid having the page deleted. I was glad when one of the bots was able to delete it. I had nominated the page for speedy deletion as soon as it was posted, but he removed that, at which point, I added it to the AfD. I hope that it gets deleted very very soon. Is it possible to have him banned? I went through his history and undid vandalism that he put onto some other wrestling pages that had not yet been caught. Mh29255 (talk) 04:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there are plenty of warning templates you can use on his talk page. See WP:WARN for a complete list. Start with a level 1 or 2 warning depending on the severity of the situation. (You may go directly to level 3 or 4 if the person has a history of disruptive edits.) And when the person ignores a level 4 warning, report him at WP:AIV and watch him as he gets blocked within the next 5 minutes. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 04:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. How did you ever find out that was my user and talk page that had been copied? --Stéphane Charette (talk) 08:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the alleged contributions, knowing that this person's account was only a couple of hours old. I went to those pages and checked "What links here." There was your user page. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 11:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blanchardb. I'd like to ask you to take a second look at the Replay Publishing page, which was nominated for AfD. I've added a number of references to the page, as well as beefing up the article text and links. Any further constructive criticism you could give would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Kezzran (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am improving the page. Please give me some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Talking Mac (talk • contribs) 18:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah.. I was just looking up the website tag, and went back to the page to re-edit only to discover you already corrected it. Thanks a lot :) EuroSong ^talk 13:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I just noticed that we both tagged it for deletion. I did a prod; you did AfD. It's excessive to leave both on, but I think the page is weak enough that prod would be sufficient. What do you think? — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that the PROD had been added in the time it took for me to complete my AfD.

As a personal policy, I never prod a newly created article: those tend to be contested by their authors. The AfD is already being discussed (two comments already), so I think the PROD, at this point, is redundant. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 15:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was another article I also AfD'd. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 15:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry for the confusion. Did you mean to post on the talk page of my recall process page? If you did intend to request my recall, that's fine, I was just a little confused. Could you clarify, please? Thanks, Keilana_(recall) 23:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did not notice that the recall on your signature was for the talk page of recall. I posted there thinking it was your regular talk page. I think you should change it, otherwise many of your "regular" messages will be posted there, regardless of their relevance to the recall process. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 23:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I've changed it, is it better now? Is it alright with you if I delete the recall talk page, as you are not making a request for recall? Keilana^talk_(recall) 23:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, you are not able to delete that page unless you are an admin. :-) Blanking it is okay, though. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 23:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considering [1], I'll take the deletion route. :) Keilana^talk_(recall) 23:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've replied on my talk page. —SMALLJIM  17:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain yourself?

You changed an article I just started to a redirect, without any explanation or discussion.

In the interests of consensus, and openness, and complying with WP:NOT#wikipedia is not a battleground may I suggest you consider getting in the habit of making a greater effort to explain yourself? Geo Swan (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]