Philip is famous on YouTube and doesn't have a wikipedia article. He's got more subscribers and views than half of the people listed on this site. What can I do to keep the article up? I'm learning all I can as fast as I can. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleBobby629 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete an article I created 10 minutes ago? I wasn't even through with it! That was wrong and uncalled for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleBobby629 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate.

A tag has been placed on Evangelical Free Church of Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

You may wish to familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia guidelines before proceeding. Articles in Wikipedia must be about notable subjects and the notability of those subjects must be verifiable. It is not enough for an organization merely to exist -- it must have somehow distinguished itself from its peers and become notable, and that notability must be corroborated by independent third-party arm's-length sources (such as magazine articles, etc.). If I can help further, leave a note on my talk page. Accounting4Taste 20:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The tag has been removed by DGG.

I had assumed that's what happened. In either case, no problem. Mgiganteus1 15:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of that love note left on my user page! ... discospinster _talk 00:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! The length people will go to to get their point across. Kaeso Dio 21:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to England national rugby union team. The advent of professionalism didn't arrive in late 1872!. More like 1995. Moriori 00:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by nonsense? Taliban is a religious movement, not a race movement. Litrboxr, Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Thanks for uploading Image:Viau Bridge.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Resized0008.jpg. The copy called Image:Resized0008.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that you reconsider you decision on my arena kickball page. I would like to bring to your attention that this page does have meaningful content and history. My school is looking for arena kickball rules and I thought to myself, where better to put them then wikipedia. So this content is meaningful to people and does have a history. Please reconsider your decision. -Thankyou, Bean95 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bean95 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my intention with this page is to give people information on an MMORPG economy threat. i also intend to do more with the page, but as i am unable to from a Government computer. (Cintaru 18:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Some friends that don't works with the wiki much were tryoing to start a page and could not figure out how. I knew how and stubbed it for them. Can you give them a day or two to get content added before you pull it.

Hopefully the content will be wiki worthy.
--Alan92rttt 18:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, I hope you don't mind but I took the liberty of removing your speedy deletion template from the Rainforest animals article and made it a redirect to Rainforest#Fauna. I wouldn't mind terribly i it were deleted, but it seemed like a potentially useful redirect. Best wishes, --TeaDrinker 19:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing Meaningless in that topic.............

All works and Must be on wikipedia for safety of owner of coin box —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunalpradhan (talk • contribs) 19:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but I would suggest that you calm down your nomination for speedy deletion. So far today you have nominated two articles I have written for speedy deletion, based on two different rationale. Speedy deletion is a step you take when there is no doubt whatsoever that the article meets one of the criteria. If there is any doubt at all, you should instead nominate it for AfD, or in case of a question of notability, use {{notability}} to question the notability. Then let matters settle themselves. As for the article Nor-Cargo being blunt advertisement, I would really like to see your reasoning for that. Honestly, I do. Try to find one sentence that is not encyclopedic or favoringly biased in one way. What you are doing now is actually vandalism and I could actually revert them as such if I wanted to. Also, remember that to nominate articles for deletion, speedy or not, you should leave a message on the talk page, if even in brief, to explain your point of view. So please, calm down, stop vandalizing Wikipedia, you're only ruining you're integrity here. Of course, I would encourage you to contribute to the site and be bold. Arsenikk 22:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for keeping up with Special:Newpages, but I have a request: Please use an edit summary when flagging pages for speedy deletion (or, indeed, for all edits). Even giving a deletion summary like "db-bio" or "db-attack", the same name as the template, makes it easier for administrators (or, indeed, all users) to know why an article is being flagged for speedy deletion. Thanks. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 04:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I never thought of it that way. I don't feel insulted, instead rather silly. You have got a good point, nobody will ever know about the article unless it is a stub :) Big texas lump 05:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Sorry, and thanks for correcting that. P.S. - I've removed the entry on pages needing translation. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had no clue that i could not put that page in a different langguage. Stupid me. I hope that i can still write one in English. I was just trying to link the two pages. Sorry, and thank you for correcting me. I am still learning.Gottadoit2 02:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

let's help eachother out. I'll do bio articles, you do patent nonsense. deal? NewpageXKiller 17:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You hit that page before I did. I see you've AFD'd it, which is cool. It was nonsense. However, I have one comment. You AFD'd it as nonsense, Puissant blanked his page then you AFD'd it again because it was blanked. YOu already have one AFD on that page. DOn't you think the second one was excessive ? Heck, anyone checking the history of that page could see what was on it and that it was nonsense, so there would be no problem on just the first AFD alone. (*By the way - I'm not that page's creator nor related nor have any stake in it - I just patrol all new changes! *) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoshVorlon (talk • contribs) 18:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm serious! Don't delete my article!

The Wiki Whore 12:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karthik Why have you deleted this page of mine. I had created an article on an editor of a popular magazine in India. How can you staying in some other country asses the popularity of the person? Or was my article deleted since it talked about a Hindu relgious person and given your religious background, you choose to delete the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthik (talk • contribs) 16:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability? You don't think a retailer with branches globally is notable? --Lemming64 15:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...I noticed the same problem, and went back to delete those articles which had been overlooked. Hi there. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I really can't believe you... You come from Quebec, speak a couple languages, spend your time on wikipedia clicking on refresh "recently changed pages" and must be so happy to have added a "copyright infringement" for Zeppoo... So first thing is that you do not know anything about computer science and feel free to say the article is useless (basically). Once I notice you that, you decide to change the purpose of the reporting, probably thinking: "ah! I'm going to get that one and make sure it is erased just for my pleasure!". Did you *even* go on the website? Did you notice the word "copyright" somewhere? Funny, I don't think so. Why? Because there isn't! You must be so proud of you. Isn't it said between the lines of the Bible not to do such a mean/useless thing? To have read it when I was younger, I'll have to answer yes. Xionbox —Preceding comment was added at 18:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All text is copyrighted, unless the author has specifically released it into the public domain or under a copyleft license such as the GFDL. If a text does not specifically say that it is not copyrighted, then it is, and copying it is not legal. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I'm sorry to say that I do not see why my message is not polite. I am just expressing my point of view, with no vulgarity, unless asking questions is considered by certain people as such. Second, I'm sorry I didn't know that very text which is not specifically marked as "copyleft" or another free of use licience is considered as copyrighted. I'll be more cautious next time. Have a nice day. Xionbox 18:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, yes, I did go to the website - to check whether the copyright checker bot had returned a false positive. Indeed, the text was significantly similar as to constitute a copyright violation, so the bot was right in this instance. By default, any text you take from the Web is presumed copyrighted. And since there was no assertion of permission from the website's owner either in the article or on its talk page, then Wikipedia had no choice but to delete your article. All I did was nominate your article for speedy deletion as copyright violation. The administrator who performed the actual deletion agreed with me. --Blanchardb 19:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But I did think it was a very quick reaction. The wbesite owner could of posted a message a couple days later, but I guess that is not a possibility on Wikipedia. Xionbox 20:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we do have a very good reaction time when removing copyright violations, which are illegal, from Wikipedia. We're very proud of how well we do this. If Wikipedia policy recommended allowing such violations to remain for a while, or recommended not deleting the articles until we'd asked the owners of the copyrights to comment, then we'd definitely be violating the law. The Foundation would probably become a target for all kinds of lawsuits, and be bankrupted, and then Wikipedia and all its sisters would cease to exist. Without Wikipeida, ignorance would cover the world. Wars, bigotry, and cruelty would increase. In time, the Great World War would eliminate all human life, and the cockroaches would inherit the earth. So it's good that we delete copyright violations so efficiently. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't you exaggerating a little bit?:-) --Blanchardb 22:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for Zeppoo, if you can assert that the software is notable under Wikipedia's notability criteria without simply copying text from the organization's website, you are welcome to start a new article on it. Eventually, you will have to provide reliable sources for your assertion. But the assertion itself, if valid, will make sure that, if the article gets deleted, it will not be under the speedy deletion process. --Blanchardb 23:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll see what I can do. I'll probably try and contact the owner so he can add informations directly. @FisherQueen: Oohhh, now I understand! Thanks =) (I love to do that kind of demonstration too). Xionbox 18:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was writing an article on MSN Scripts, when BY ACCIDENT I clicked Save Page instead of Show Preview, now since I have Vista and a hi-speed internet, I couldn't click ESC in time, and it got saved. I didn't mean for it to save so quickly without any information