Another Believer (talk | contribs) + |
Armadillopteryx (talk | contribs) →My condolences: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 522: | Line 522: | ||
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1135850744 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1135850744 --> |
||
{{Collapse bottom}} |
{{Collapse bottom}} |
||
== My condolences == |
|||
Hey, I just wanted to say I'm really sorry to see that Kobe passed away. Sending my condolences and a big hug. <span style="font-family:Serifa">[[User:Armadillopteryx|<span style="color:#739900;">Armadillo</span>]][[User talk:Armadillopteryx|<span style="color:#b3b300;">pteryx</span>]]</span> 00:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:04, 31 January 2023
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Happy New Year, Another Believer
- @Chris troutman: Thank you! Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Extended content
|
---|
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
User:Another Believer/Projects/Video Games
Extended content
|
---|
More GA or FA video games?:).Happy New year! 88.236.107.149 (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Oh. Ok no problems thanks. 88.236.107.149 (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
Happy New Year, Another Believer
@TheManishPanwar: Thanks! Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Improvement
Hi sir, would you please help me to improve my one article.
Draft:Sachidanand Bharti - Wikipedia — MANISH talk 16:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Another Believer!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Moops Thanks! Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- :)
- — Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2023)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|

Extended content
|
---|
![]() A tag has been placed on Category:Categories created during Wiki Loves Pride 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of Bailey's Taproom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bailey's Taproom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @BuySomeApples Thank you! I look forward to responding to any concerns you may have. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bluehour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterMatt12 -- MasterMatt12 (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @MasterMatt12 Thanks! Looking forward to addressing any concerns you may have. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Bluehour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bluehour and Talk:Bluehour/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterMatt12 -- MasterMatt12 (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Aviv (restaurant) for deletion

Extended content
|
---|
![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviv (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- (sigh...) ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Resilient Barnstar |
For having to deal with my accusation of paid editing, and dealing with it calmly and appropriately. MasterMatt12(talk) 01:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks. I wish there were more I could do about the ick factor and the sketchy editor(s) causing me so much frustration, but I appreciate you've shared what you can. I'd appreciate if you would strike or collapse your accusation in the nomination discussion and please let me know if there's anything else you need from me re: Bluehour. For now, take care. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
![]() |
Sorry that all this is happening to you, I don't know why some people just decide to be unkind. I'm reviewing the page now but I also wanted to let you know that not everyone is out to get you. A lot of us appreciate your contributions. BuySomeApples (talk) 09:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- I was stopping by to say the same. Wow! What an awful thing to do (re: [1] and WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej). S0091 (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @S0091 Thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- I was stopping by to say the same. Wow! What an awful thing to do (re: [1] and WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej). S0091 (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
Extended content
|
---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
|
What Hells Angels and drag queens can teach us about stigma
Thought you'd be interested in this as a possl source. The Cambridge Judge Business School website link is just an introduction to the actual paper which should be great for a citation or two. They say "Organisational stigma is better understood through the lens of 'Straight Outta Detroit' and 'RuPaul’s Drag Race', as illustrated by a special issue of the Journal of Management Studies co-edited and co-introduced by Thomas Roulet of Cambridge Judge Business School." ☆ Bri (talk) 03:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- BTW that other Seattle editor I told you about and I are among the top 10 editors at List of outlaw motorcycle clubs. So we'll def have stuff to talk about! ☆ Bri (talk) 03:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2023)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Bailey's Taproom
The article Bailey's Taproom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bailey's Taproom and Talk:Bailey's Taproom/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 00:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bailey's Taproom
The article Bailey's Taproom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bailey's Taproom for comments about the article, and Talk:Bailey's Taproom/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! BuySomeApples (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2022
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
File:Tusk (Portland, Oregon) logo.png listed for discussion


A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tusk (Portland, Oregon) logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2023)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The article Bluehour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bluehour for comments about the article, and Talk:Bluehour/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterMatt12 -- MasterMatt12 (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @MasterMatt12 Thanks for reviewing and related help. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asian restaurants in Chicago

Extended content
|
---|
![]() A tag has been placed on Category:Asian restaurants in Chicago indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2023)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 54
Extended content
|
---|
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
Notability question
Hi. You seem to know a lot about restaurants and dining notability, so I wanted to ask you if you think Yardley Inn (an article at afd) is notable. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Another Believer has over 250 talkpage watchers so you might just get more interaction at this AfD than you expected because of that. That said, I have an opinion from interacting on some of the Portland restaurant AfDs and think I have a feel for how this will go, especially if people following AB attend Yardley Inn debate. Bottom line is that there has been some notability creep around restaruarant articles IMO. You can kiss off all the local media. Stuff like Philadelphia Inquirer will help only if it's a full article about that particular restaurant, and even then with a caveat. There's even been pushback on James Beard awards, Michelin starred reviews, and "best of city" by the city's newspaper of record, so it's an unreasonable uphill battle to demonstrate notability. If the deletion debate gets really involved, WP:SIRS will be applied source-by-source by some eager editor, maybe even in a table format, with "extreme prejudice" even towards something of the stature of The New York Times doing a restaurant review in their own delivery area (this is a real objection I saw in an AfD). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Dozen Doughnut Company and expand the source table for an example. N.b. Zagat is deprecated by name at WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS section of the criteria. From quick perusal I'd give the odds of survival at less than 50-50 at this point. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11 Thanks for the invite, but I'm not interested in weighing in here. Frankly, I'm exhausted by the shenanigans surrounding restaurant articles lately. A handful of editors have tried to make Wikipedia editing very frustrating for me ever since Draft:Daily Dozen Doughnut Company caused the earth's axis to shift. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Irene Dubois for deletion

Extended content
|
---|
![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Dubois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Sorry to hear it
I'm sorry about your dog, AB. Bishonen | tålk 20:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC).
- Same. Really sucks to lose a pet. :c Elli (talk | contribs) 20:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Bishonen and Elli: Thank you, both. He was a wonderful companion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I just saw this and thought I should say something positive, though it's hard to think of what that might be. Life sucks sometimes. Better times ahead for you, I hope. Your friend – ☆ Bri (talk) 03:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2023)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Women in Red in February 2023
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
My condolences
Hey, I just wanted to say I'm really sorry to see that Kobe passed away. Sending my condolences and a big hug. Armadillopteryx 00:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.